Categories
Accountability government transparency international affairs

John Kerry, Super-Villain

Whistleblowers and unclassified emails inform us that when he was the secretary of state under Obama, John Kerry thwarted arrests of Iranians illegally acting on behalf of the Iranian state.

While in the United States.

According to Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, “whistleblower disclosures” reveal that while the Obama administration was negotiating with Iran to “prevent” it from acquiring nuclear weapons, “then-​Secretary of State John Kerry actively interfered with [the FBI’s executing of arrest warrants] on individuals in the U.S. illegally supporting Iranian efforts … to develop weapons of mass destruction and its ballistic missile program.”

FBI agents were frustrated because, they said in emails, they had to ask field agents “to stand down on a layup arrest … and wait until the U.S. and Iran negotiations resolve themselves.”

At least one of the protected suspects was on a terrorism watch list.

Seriously?

We need John Kerry to play the bad guy in a revival of 24, trying to stop super-​agent Jack Bauer from taking out terrorists because the U.S. is in the middle of shipping pallets of cash to the terrorism-​sponsoring government. A very delicate operation that must be executed with hair-​trigger precision and without antagonizing the terrorism-​sponsoring recipients.

Kerry’s most recent job: Weather Envoy. He retired from it this year. Apparently, tweaking global climate isn’t as easy as he’d thought.

Could have been worse. This dour, long-​faced pillar of pretense, Kerry, almost became President of the United States. 

We must keep reminding ourselves of this.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder and Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

Categories
First Amendment rights national politics & policies social media

A Package Deal

Suppose suggested legislation outlaws both murder and walking. How could you oppose it? Are you, a dedicated perambulator-​peripatetic, also a murder-supporter?

Obviously, this would be an attempt to foist a package deal consisting of unrelated or mutually contradictory elements.

Consider a more true-​to-​life example.

In the Wall Street Journal, Philip Hamburger argues that a congressional bill targeting TikTok would do much more than counter Chinazi spying on Americans (“The TikTok Bill Is a Sneak Attack on Free Speech”).

If curbing or even outlawing TikTok were the sole focus, one could argue the merits of the legislation given what is known about the company’s collecting of data and its relationship with the Chinese government. There’s no free-​speech protection of foreign espionage.

However, as Hamburger points out, the bill gives the federal government “sweeping power over communications” and could be used to stifle speech protected by the Constitution.

The proposed statute would allow the Department of Commerce to undertake open-​ended mitigation of “undue or unacceptable” risk regarded as arising from use of communications technology in which any entity subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign adversary “has any interest.”

This is very vague and very all-​encompassing. The legislation thus confers power over domestic communication companies “that could be used to extort their cooperation in censorship.”

Attempts to resist such “mitigation” or censorship would risk administrative fines of $250,000, criminal penalties of $1 million, two decades in prison. For supporting freedom of speech?

Please walk away from this, Congress.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with Midjourney /​ DALL-​E2

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

Categories
international affairs

Desperate Times, Measures

Desperate times call up desperate politicians who demand desperate measures which require desperate counter-measures.

But while you might be thinking of Donald Trump, COVID, riots, and Biden-​Harris, desperation isn’t just an American problem.

“Italy Government on Verge of Collapse as Renzi Party Quits,” Bloomberg informed us last week. What precipitated Renzi’s exit from the coalition government? The persistence in that government of an anti-​immigrant party. Sounds familiar.

In Estonia, “Prime Minister Juri Ratas resigned over an inquiry into a property development,” according to U.S. News & World Report. In the 2019 elections, the Reform Party had won a plurality of seats, but Ratas had to put together a coalition with other parties to form a government. Now Reform will lead a coalition, but, we are told the new coalition will not likely “include the far-​right EKRE party, whose leaders denounced the U.S. election result as rigged and called President-​elect Joe Biden ‘corrupt.’”

In the Netherlands, the whole government resigned because of a scandal involving government-​provided child-​care funds. Bureaucrats had “wrongly accused thousands of working families of fraud and ordered them to repay childcare benefits between 2013 and 2019.” But the resignation is somewhat hollow, since officials still hold a “caretaker status” while the country goes through another lockdown.

To cause even more chaos, here’s a fourth example: Belarus. The International Ice Hockey Federation just stripped the nation from hosting its world championship because, as Politico reports, “Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has used the country’s security forces to violently oppress protesters since his disputed election victory in August last year.”*

The crisis appears worldwide. And the answer in each case — including in the USA — is for citizens to have to more constitutional and democratic checks on government.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


* In a leaked audio tape to Radio Free Europe, a senior government official can be heard discussing “plans to build an internment camp — complete with barbed wire — for political prisoners.”

PDF for printing

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

Categories
international affairs

The Grateful President

What are you thankful for?

Surely you were asked over Thanksgiving by friends or relatives — just as the president was by reporters. No doubt you had more social grace than to launch into a full-​throated self-endorsement.

In his defense, President Trump first answered, “For having a great family,” before quickly pivoting to “and for having made a tremendous difference in this country.… This country is so much stronger now than it was when I took office that you wouldn’t believe it.”

Yes, hard to believe.

Thankful for Saudi Arabia? The Donald is. Oil prices are down.

Controversially, Trump also decided that Saudi Arabia has suffered enough for their grisly state murder of Washington Post contributor Jamaal Khashoggi. U.S. sanctions have indeed been firmly placed on 17 Saudis accused of involvement in the murder, but no action taken against Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who the CIA “assesses” was “likely responsible.” 

“It’s a very complex situation,” the president told reporters. “It is what it is.

“We’re not going to give up hundreds of billions of dollars in orders and let Russia, China and everybody else have them,” Trump continued. “It’s America first.”

“Our relationship with Saudi Arabia has always been transactional,” explained the American Enterprise Institute’s Danielle Pletka on NBC’s Meet the Press. “Our relationship with Saudi Arabia has always been about our larger goals in the region, not out of admiration for Saudi Arabia’s rule of law, human rights record, or anything else.”

“Transactional” is a pretty word for this foreign policy, with pretense about human rights or without.

How thankful should we be for that?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

 


PDF for printing

 


» See popular posts from Common Sense with Paul Jacob HERE.