The beginning of the end of actor James Woods’s time on Twitter likely occurred on July 20, 2018.
Only recently discovering a tweet that he posted then, Twitter has locked Woods out of a forum where his right-leaning messages have been followed by 1,730,000 people.
His delinquent tweet forwarded an image of giddily grinning guys promising to abstain from voting so that a woman’s vote would be “worth more.” Woods tweeted: “Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible.”
Twitter told the actor that if he agreed to the deletion of this fake-news tweet — simple enough — it would let him tweet once again.
Woods refuses.
“Free speech is free speech — it’s not [Twitter CEO] Jack Dorsey’s version of free speech,” Woods says. “The irony is, Twitter accused me of affecting the political process, when in fact their banning of me is the truly egregious interference.… If you want to kill my free speech, man up and slit my throat with a knife, don’t smother me with a pillow.”
There’s lots more where that came from, but you get the idea. I don’t, um, strictly agree with everything Woods says here. But I can only applaud the spirit of his refusal to submit to Twitter’s arbitrary standards of acceptable speech.
Oh, and one other thing: somebody tell Twitter that parodies are inherently fake.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
1 reply on “James Woods, Parody, and a Pillow”
This is so ridiculous! I do follow Mr. Woods on Twitter (or I did). I don’t agree with everything he says but he has such a delightfully wicked sense of humor; it’s enjoyable. He is a Mensa member, so regardless of what 1 thinks of his politics, he is a critical thinker.
Twitter’s algorithms flagged this tweet as potentially influencing the outcome of an election. Clearly this meme is a joke. 3 guys yucking it up with the nonsense of making it an all women’s vote. What moron would think this was a legitimate political statement? How could this nonsense influence the outcome of an election. Further doesn’t every political tweet have the power to influence an election? Isn’t that why politicians & pundits use Twitter to reach their voters / base?
Jack Dorsey wanted any excuse to get rid of Mr. Woods & it’s absurd.