South Pittsburg council members are tired of criticism.
So they’ve outlawed it.
Officials in the “tidiest town in Tennessee” say that the negativity hampers their work.
According to Ryan Lewis’s report in Times Free Press, the policy, passed in December, forbids city employees, contractors, vendors and “anyone associated with the town in an official capacity who uses social networks” from publishing criticism “about the city, its employees or other associates” on such networks.
Only one council member, Paul King, voted No. The new law is “telling me what I can say at night. I call that freedom of speech. I can’t understand that.”
City officials like Mayor Jane Dawkins (pictured) seem to conflate criticism as such, including merely untrue criticism, with “out-and-out lies,” and to regard censoring all criticism as an okay means of preventing alleged lies. But their blanket action goes way beyond any reasonable resort to defamation laws, which require more than mere putative falsehood, let alone putative negativity, to prove an actionable civil wrong.
Even if affected parties were assenting explicitly to the new policy, no agreement to forfeit one’s basic rights — whether freedom of speech or association, trial by jury, or any other — is properly enforceable.
The proper function of government is to protect these rights.
Not to violate them — even if officials are terribly annoyed by their exercise.
Every South Pittsburg council member who voted for this edict should be tossed out of office in the next election. If not sooner.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.