Categories
Common Sense

Gas Price Fears

Fear stinks.

Literally, yes; but figuratively, too.

Moved by fear, we tend to get a bit irrational. Whenever something unpleasant happens to us all, there’s this tendency for mass irrationality.

I bring this up just as much to remind myself as to remind you. We’re all affected. Even something as mundane as gasoline prices can send the collective intelligence down a few IQ points.

Recently I wrote a column at Townhall on the widespread belief that prices will always and only go up.

I suggested that gas prices would likely go down soon. I’m not an economist. But I do remember a bit of history … some of the history that has occurred in my own life!

Why would prices plummet? Well, oil is such an important product that not only can it “drive us crazy,” but when the prices go high enough, it can cause recessions — that is, economy-​wide business and project and plan failures. So, during recessions, demand goes down. And when that happens, prices have to go down, to follow. As Alan Reynolds of the Cato Institute reminds us, this has happened nine times since World War II. The drops ranged from 44 percent to 76 percent.

And, as Reynolds points out, even small-​but-​persistent demand drops, even without a recession, can cause the downturn in prices.

So the last thing we should do is let our gas price fears drive us to seek solutions from politicians.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Categories
Common Sense

Remember Rangel

Have you ever tried to build a multi-​million dollar monument to yourself?

No? Well, I guess you’re not New York Congressman Charley Rangel. He’s been trying to fund the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at the City College of New York.

Monday, July 28, 2008

So far he’s nabbed a $1.9 million earmark to help put his name in lights, not to mention two HUD Department grants totaling another $700,000 from taxpayers.

Rangel’s goal is to raise $30 million for his Center. So, now he’s raising more money from special interests. Including those interests that have business before the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which Rangel chairs.

While watchdog groups are questioning the ethics of this fundraising in general, Rangel’s use of official congressional letterhead to solicit contributions for the Center seems without question to be a violation of House rules.

Recently, Rangel ran into more trouble in New York City, when it came to light that the congressman has four rent-​stabilized apartments. Once again, government regulation benefits the powerful.

Did I mention that this same congressman uses taxpayer money — $777 a month — to lease a Cadillac? Rangel says he wants his constituents to think their congressman is “somebody.”

Give him his due, though. After 38 years in Congress, Mr. Rangel has firmly established himself as a somebody — somebody responsible for helping achieve the lowest congressional approval ratings in history.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Categories
Common Sense

Trashy Governance in Britain

Talk about treating citizens like trash.

According to a New York Times report, garbage removal is getting worse and worse in Great Britain. Many local governments now pick up the trash only every other week, instead of every week.

And there are thousands of rules to obey:

  • About recycling.
  • Exactly when to deposit your garbage.
  • Against depositing “too much” garbage.

Special enforcement officers go around to check — and fine residents who fail to comply.

One victim of the trashy regime is Gareth Corkhill, a Whitehall resident fined £215 for leaving a garbage lid ajar. Then he got socked with another fine, for £225, when he couldn’t pay the first fine. Neighbors got together and paid the fine.

And complained.

The town rector, Reverend John Bannister, says receiving a criminal record “for leaving your wheelie bin open by three inches has, I think, really gone beyond the bounds of responsible behavior.”

That’s British understatement.

It’s not the ability to dispose of garbage that has disappeared in Britain. It’s the permission to do it. What really needs dumping is the authoritarian mentality.

First, stop punishing recipients of mediocre service who imperfectly submit to the mediocrity.

Second, privatize garbage pickup. Let entrepreneurship and competition freely work throughout the land.

Hey, people with extra garbage might be charged a little more. But there is no good reason to treat them like outlaws for providing “too much” business.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Categories
Common Sense

Domestic Terrorism Since 9/​11

Terrorism still vexes Europe, and seems unavoidable in Middle East hot spots. But since 9/​11, thank goodness, there’s been no domestic terrorism in the United States.

But what do we say when we see a story about a terrorist attack on U.S. soil?

Let’s qualify the statement: There’s been no successful Al Qaeda-​masterminded terrorist attack in America since September 11, 2001. But we do have thugs here who try to achieve political ends through terror.

Consider animal rights activists who do much more than advocate being kind to kittens. That is, consider animal activists who blow things up. A group called the Animal Liberation Front, or ALF, just “claimed responsibility” & “accepted blame” for torching an empty van on the campus of UCLA.

The chancellor of UCLA, Gene Block, says that with this assault, directed at property and individuals “not associated with animal research,” the activists have crossed a line.

Block seems to assume that the animal rights terrorists have done something worse now than when they’re torching a lab where animal experiments are taking place. Or, for that matter, a McDonald’s where hamburger-​eating takes place. To me it all seems equally — seriously — criminal.

Oh, these cuddly activists don’t usually try to murder people. But if and when they do, they’ll have the same anti-​human excuses for it. Excuses that will make as little sense then as they do now.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Categories
Common Sense

Scare Tactic in Oklahoma

The political establishment resists reform. Voters have had to take their favorite causes — like term limits and tax limits — over the heads of politicians, directly to fellow voters.

And politicians don’t much like us voters having all that say-so.

That’s why they’ve tried to legislate the initiative process out of existence.

And that’s why three of us — Rick Carpenter, Susan Johnson, and I — are facing what the Wall Street Journal has called a “bizarre” criminal prosecution by Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson.

Edmondson is trying to lock us up for ten years for supposedly violating the state’s residency law, even though those working on the petition followed the rules as explained to them by state officials … and even though the constitutionality of the law is currently being challenged in federal court.

Why the strange prosecution? To frighten folks from doing initiatives. Recently the state’s largest paper, The Oklahoman, decried how difficult the process has become, with the people getting to vote on only two of the 23 initiatives filed this decade.

We, the Oklahoma Three, face a preliminary hearing — and the wrath of a rogue attorney general — July 23rd. Scary? Yes. But we’ll prevail. And perhaps inspire more people to defend the initiative against its most insatiable enemy, the politicians.

And hey: Already a new group, Oklahomans for Initiative Rights, has launched its own citizen task force to study reforming the state’s initiative process.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Categories
Common Sense

Pick Your Battles

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Second Amendment means what it says: The right of the people to keep and bear arms — that is, have guns — must not be infringed. While more limited in scope than we might wish, District of Columbia v. Heller affirms that the amendment specifies a right of individuals.

To some observers, the lawsuit yielding this ruling had seemed a bit like tilting at windmills. One skeptic was Glen Reynolds, publisher of the popular blog, InstaPundit. Reynolds, who also teaches law, doubted that a majority could be found on the high court to affirm an individual-​rights reading of the Second Amendment.

He now says, “I was wrong, and [Bob Levy] was right. And I’m glad!”

Levy is the Cato Institute scholar who, five years ago, organized and largely bankrolled the suit against the city of Washington, D.C. The city bans residents from owning handguns even to protect their own homes.

Levy notes that Heller is just the “opening salvo” in all the litigation needed to clarify our Second Amendment rights. But at least we now have a “blockbuster decision” that greatly improves the chances of reviving the amendment’s original meaning.

We advocates of liberty must pick our battles. But Heller reminds us that the political landscape and how the struggle itself will affect the prospects for success can’t always be predicted. Levy has certainly proved that this battle is winnable.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.