Author: Redactor

I don’t get too excited about either major political party. When the Democrats are in, I think, “Oh my goodness, the Democrats are in!” With the Republicans in, I think, “Oh my goodness, the Republicans are in!” When everything is nice and bipartisan, I think: “Oh my goodness, another pay raise!”

Speaking of partisan, Democrats view George Soros as an angel for sending millions of dollars to groups opposing President Bush. But they view Darrell Issa, who funded the recall of California Governor Gray Davis, as the devil. Republicans view it just the opposite. I like that these folks give politically and just wish I had their home phone numbers.

Republican Congressman Bob Ney is now threatening to subpoena groups opposing his policy positions and force them to appear before him so he can rake them over the coals. Welcome to the brave new world of McCain-​Feingold. I’ve been on the receiving end from career politicians of both parties during my several tours of congressional testimony duty. I knew why they wanted to know our donors.

So, like a gang of low-​rent dictators, they could hurt these men and women for opposing them politically. Congressman John Mica called for the IRS and the Federal Election Commission to investigate these groups, saying they are, “the greatest threat to the federal election process we have ever seen.” Anything that threatens “the federal election process” is a darn good thing. Let’s stop congressmen from regulating and harassing Americans who wish to speak their minds. This is America. Bring it on!

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Losing an election is not the same thing as getting your head chopped off. The Manchester Guardian had a headline recently: “President Puts Head on Block.” The story is about how South Korean President Roh Moo-​hyun “put an electoral gun to his head” by calling for a national referendum on whether he should stay in office. Whether it’s gun or chopping block, the metaphor is oddly apt.

That’s exactly how many politicians do regard letting voters decide their fate. Certainly we saw it in the California recall, as Gray Davis desperately scrambled to cling to power. Yet here’s the South Korean president openly calling for a referendum on himself. South Koreans are stunned. They’re used to a more autocratic style from their political leaders. British headline writers are stunned. Roh may think he’s got a surefire maneuver to strengthen his power.

What he claims, however, is that he’s facing a lot of political corruption that is blockading his administration. And he points his finger at the political class. He says, “I have reached a situation in which I cannot conduct the presidency. If the ethical standards of the ruling class of our society can be rectified, then I believe this will be a greater political achievement than what I can accomplish during the remainder of my tenure.”

He seems to think the referendum will be a slap in the right direction. Maybe. In any case, it’s a lot better for a political leader to openly invite the assessment of the voters, than to just bull his way through, regardless.

Many readers have said to me, it’s great that California voters kicked Governor Gray Davis out of office. But unless the policies change, California will still end up falling into the sea. Much as I agree with my own argument that it was virtually impossible for Californians to do worse than Davis, I certainly also agree that policies must change.

Many areas deserve attention, but one of the most important is the state’s attitude toward business. Inhospitable, to say the least. It’s time to reverse the political animosity toward earning a living and helping other people make a living. In an article for the magazine Ideas on Liberty , Steven Greenhut explains why so many businessmen are seeking greener pastures across state lines. He tells how Coast Converters, a plastic-​bag manufacturer, had to shut its doors and flee to Nevada, where the company will be hailed rather than harried.

At a press conference, chairman Michael Greif said he didn’t want to leave California but that “as a businessman I have no choice. If I stay in California I will be subject to more punitive taxes and fees that will eventually force me to cut jobs. Instead our workers are moving with the factory to Nevada where I will save $800,000 annually in taxes, insurance, workers compensation, and onerous regulations.” Other businesses tell the same story.

Can Governor Schwarzenegger terminate the bad policies of the past? He can if he doesn’t allow the legislature to be the last word. First thing to do, take that veto pen out of cold storage.

This is Common Sense.  I’m Paul Jacob.

I never worried much about whether Americans were getting fatter. Only whether I was getting fatter. Yes, I was. Oh, don’t worry, don’t call the ambulance or anything. It was only a few pounds and then I started trimming it by eating lousy-​tasting stuff instead of good-​tasting stuff. Also by jogging. Well, I stopped jogging and started eating cake and cookies again, but the point is I could get thin again in a flash.

Two recent stories talk about how Americans are getting thinner, and … also fatter. One headline says, “Study Finds Americans Starting to Lose Weight.” The other says “Americans Getting Even Fatter.” I think the disparity has to do with how the samples are picked and over what period of time. Americans are no doubt fatter than we were back in the day certainly fatter than people in third-​world countries who have trouble getting enough food. At the same time, most of us Americans get to live into our 70s. For the same reason we’re so fat: we’re so rich. Which also gives us time to exercise. You know, exercise is the best diet: if you burn more calories than you take in, you lose pounds. It all boils down to a simple scientific equation.

Is our fattiness a problem? Well, not for me I can lose the pounds in a snap. It is a problem if I have to start paying for somebody else’s fat problem. We’re turning into a nanny society, which does worry me. Heck, soon we’ll have people suing McDonald’s for allegedly making people fat. Oops … can’t predict that any more. It’s already happened.

This is Common Sense.  I’m Paul Jacob.

Boy, they sure are experienced up there on Capitol Hill. Expert career politician Henry Hyde once denigrated the concept of term limits by claiming that the only alternative to permanently entrenched politicians was to pluck the names of representatives at random out of the phonebook. Recently we’ve had a couple congressmen real pros, not refugees from the phone book demonstrating their expertise in the game of pork.

Porkbarrel projects are projects that congressmen want for their state or district to help them politically. Senator John McCain, who presents himself as an opponent of pork, has just managed to get $14.3 million for the Luke Air Force Base added to the military appropriations bill. The money is wanted to add land to the base. But as Roll Call points out, the project was neither requested by the White House nor authorized by the Armed Services committee.

Absent these, the spending fits McCain’s own definition of a pork project. And yes, these kinds of self-​serving, last-​minute spending additions to appropriations bills certainly meet my own definition of pork too. The chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Republican Ted Stevens, doesn’t hesitate to add this prime chop to his spending agenda. Stevens has fought McCain’s attempts to kill pork projects in the past. But now he is magnanimous. Mainly, it’s so he can gloat. Says Stevens: “One man’s pork is another man’s alternate white meat. We don’t discriminate,” he says.

They’ll spend anything. That’s experience for you. Where’s that phonebook?

This is Common Sense.  I’m Paul Jacob.

What’s going on in Russia? It’s starting to look like the Soviet Union again. In some respects it probably never changed, but this isn’t exactly a step forward. Russian President Vladimir Putin arrested a wealthy businessman, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who also happened to be a political opponent of Vladimir Putin. The arrest was made in the most obnoxious manner possible, with masked Fedskies storming the businessman’s private plane. The government even seized a chunk of the stock of Khodorkovsky’s company, Yukos Oil.

The thug-​like actions aren’t exactly reassuring to Russia’s stock markets. Or Russian businessmen. “Shut up or be shut down” is not a reassuring message. Or a liberalizing one. It’s possible Khodorkovsky is guilty of shady dealings. But some reports suggest that his business operation is one of the most open in Russia. What we do know is that Khodorkovsky had traded sharp words with Putin at a meeting a few months ago, complaining about corruption in the sale of an oil company to the Russian government. And Putin hasn’t done anything to allay the impression that this is a political counter-​strike. Russian politicians of every ideological stripe have denounced it for being just that. This is bad stuff.

Ordinary Russians with no assets to loot should complain as best they can. Too bad they don’t also have the power to recall their president. The good news is all the public complaining already about Putin’s action. Even his own prime minister has gone on TV to question the move. Fifteen years ago, you wouldn’t have seen that kind of opposition in Russia.

This is Common Sense.  I’m Paul Jacob.