Categories
First Amendment rights ideological culture Internet controversy social media

Domination by Pseudo-experts

It’s official.

The overt and covert censorship of social-​media posts over the last several years has been extensively documented in a new congressional report, “The Weaponization of ‘Disinformation’ Pseudo-​experts and Bureaucrats: How the Federal Government Partnered With Universities to Censor Americans’ Political Speech.”

Anyone paying attention knew that this was happening. We knew that Google, Facebook, pre-​Musk Twitter and others of the biggest social-​media companies were systematically stopping account holders from uttering opinions that contradicted official government doctrines about COVID-​19, elections, and other matters.

We also knew that government officials were publicly and vehemently “suggesting” that social media companies try harder to stomp speech that some government officials disagree with.

We didn’t know — until government emails and other documents came to light thanks to various lawsuits — how routinely, behind the scenes, many federal officials were directing the censorship of specific disapproved posts.

The report’s authors say that as the 2020 election approached and the pandemic raged, people sought to discuss “the merits of unprecedented, mid-​election-​cycle changes to election procedures” and other controversial matters. But “their constitutionally protected speech was intentionally suppressed as a consequence of the federal government’s direct coordination with third-​party organizations, particularly universities and social media platforms.”

We have other sources of many of the facts here outlined. But the fact that the abuses are being formally acknowledged and detailed by the anti-​censorship wing of the federal government — instead of being swept under the rug, as is traditional — may help prevent this form of election interference from happening again.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder /​ Firefly /​ DALL-​E2

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

6 replies on “Domination by Pseudo-experts”

I wish I shared your optimism. This form of election interference has been shown to work. It will be used again and again. The most brazen case in 2020 was when the NY Post had its account suspended by social media companies. People saw it happen. It couldn’t be ignored.
Future interference may not be that blatant, but it will happen. Algorithms will be installed in software as needed to prevent certain opinions or even questions from being raised. Federal officials won’t need to get involved. The media will do their dirty work for them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *