There’s good news and there’s good news from the Show Me State.
First the good news. The Missouri House declined to follow the lead of the Missouri Senate during its recent legislative session in advancing a ballot measure to make a travesty, mockery and sham of state legislative term limits.
The proposed weakening of the limits would have doubled maximum legislative tenure from eight years to 16 years. Further, it would also have excluded terms already served from counting toward the new limit.
Had the measure ultimately been enacted, some incumbents would have been able to sit in a single seat for up to 24 years. This assault on term limits is dead … at least until next year.
Now the good news. The lawmakers deserve high praise for issuing a formal call for an amendment convention to consider the single subject of congressional term limits, making Missouri the third state to do so (after Florida and Alabama). In mid-May, the resolution for a Term Limits Convention easily passed in both chambers.
Thanks to a provision in Article V of the Constitution, if two thirds of the states (34 states) submit a similar application to convene a term limits amendment convention, the convention must be convened. The amendment that the convention produces would then be submitted to the states for ratification. Three fourths (38) are required to ratify.
We’re only in the first-steps stage here, but first steps are crucial.
Thanks for showing us how to do it, Missouri.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
3 replies on “Missouri Shows Article V Action”
Problem: As I read it a convention could not be limited to just this one subject.
It would be open to anything someone decides to put forth.
Yes, but if it looked close to happening, Congress might actually pass a term limits amendment itself to avoid the possibility.
Yes, but if it looked close to happening, Congress might actually pass a term limits amendment itself to avoid the possibility.