Northwestern University is being sued for “consciously discriminating” in favor of women and racial minorities at the expense of obviously better qualified candidates.
The suit is brought by a group of white male professors that does not include Eugene Volokh, one of its examples of applicants summarily ignored under the alleged hiring practices.
“Northwestern University School of Law refuses,” the plaintiff’s complaint reads, “to even consider hiring white male faculty candidates with stellar credentials, while it eagerly hires candidates with mediocre and undistinguished records.…
“Professor Volokh’s candidacy was never even presented to the Northwestern faculty for a vote, while candidates with mediocre and undistinguished records were interviewed and received offers because of their preferred demographic characteristics.”
One of those with the requisite demographic characteristics is Destiny Peery, a black woman who graduated near the bottom of her class at Northwestern Law School.
The suit alleges that Dan Rodriguez, the dean in 2014, the year she was hired, threatened to penalize faculty members who voted against her. She would “never even have been considered” for the appointment but for her sex and race.
Rodriguez also ordered the faculty to abstain from discussing candidates on the faculty listserv and mentioned the risk of litigation as his reason for the ban. In other words, this administrator knew that his policy was illegal and sought to cover it up.
Now the feared lawsuit has arrived, brought against Northwestern by Faculty, Alumni, and Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP).
Wobbly acronym, sure, but Federal law is clear in outlawing hiring discrimination based on race or sex.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with Krea and Firefly
—
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
2 replies on “Diversity versus Merit”
It’s worth noting how the word “diversity” came to have such social power.
Up to a particular point, any challenge to adjustive racial or sexual discrimination (“affirmative action”) that might otherwise have succeeded before the Supreme Court was short-circuited by offering out-of-court settlements to plantiffs. When such challenges finally began reaching the Court, the Justices pondered whether any legitimate reasons could be found for considering something other than individual merit.
And the thought of some Justices was that diversity beyond the participation of those who were most successful in a prevailing institutional culture might itself be a good thing. The Justices said that diversity as such might be sufficiently important that some candidates could be given special consideration for the sake of it.
Thereafter, those seeking to leverage ethnicity, sex, or sexual proclivity into privilege sought to make a claim that giving them such privilege would advance diversity. A coalition ad hoc formed, mutually supporting privilege for its members, disguised as pursuit of diversity.
At this point, many people seem to have forgot what “diversity” really means and why some sorts of diversity might be very good; because “diversity” has devolved into a code-word for a parasitic monoculture.
Diversity and equality are at odds with one another. EEOC forbids the use of ‘neutral’ or ‘objective’ standards that might have a ‘disproportionately negative’ impact on a particular race, color, sex, etc. So discrimination is permitted against white men, since they are considered to be ‘privileged’ (or something like that). Eugene Volokh and others like him are in a tough fight against DEI. DEI has the upper hand against merit in today’s society.