Categories
Accountability Common Sense local leaders responsibility

The Rule of Want-To

Maryland election workers should definitely not have to wait a full two days after the November 8th General Election to begin processing mailed-in ballots.

At least, that’s my opinion.

It’s also the view of the Democrat-controlled General Assembly. 

Plus, it’s the preference of the state’s Republican Governor, as well as what the State Election Board wants to do “[a]fter a primary cycle plagued by long delays arising from counting a surge of mail-in ballots.”

Accordingly, you might surmise that when the Maryland Court of Appeals recently agreed with a lower court that the Election Board was A-OK to count mail-in ballots early, before the election, I would applaud their ruling. 

Instead: the Bronx cheer.

This decision undercuts something much more important than ballot-counting speed and efficiency. It destroys the rule of law.

There is a constitutional method for repealing or changing laws on the books, and in fact, as The Washington Post explained,“State lawmakers tried to change the law during this year’s legislative session when they passed a bill that would have permanently removed the provision. But, Gov. Larry Hogan (R), who said he supported counting mail-in ballots early, vetoed the bill, citing other concerns with the legislation.”

Thus, the state’s representative political process spoke, for better or worse. It may be “an outdated law,” as The Post charged, but if it isn’t violating anyone rights, it should not be jettisoned by a judge for the government’s momentary convenience.

Government officials should be required to follow the law, when as here they can, until changed.

Not merely do whatever they want to. 

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with DALL-E

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

1 reply on “The Rule of Want-To”

Having a race seemingly flipped by mail-in ballots disturbs a great many people, and all the more so if a delay makes falsifications seem more plausible. Yet the plaintiff in this case has been a candidate who claimed that the 2020 Presidential Election was stolen and has asserted that he will not recognize the legitimacy in the Maryland Gubernatorial Election if the law is not followed. The ruling of the court manages to be both bad law and bad politics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *