The New York Times admits it: “America Has a Free Speech Problem.” But the March 18 editorial, while trying carefully to distinguish one kind of speech issue from another, fails to acknowledge the full extent of the problem.
The trouble, you guessed it, is partly a left versus right issue: “Many on the left refuse to acknowledge that cancel culture exists at all, believing that those who complain about it are offering cover for bigots to peddle hate speech,” which strikes me as a fairly accurate account. But the Times cannot help itself — the right must be made to seem worse. “Many on the right,” the editorial goes on, “for all their braying about cancel culture, have embraced an even more extreme version of censoriousness as a bulwark against a rapidly changing society, with laws that would ban books, stifle teachers and discourage open discussion in classrooms.”
Sans persuasive examples — the Times provides none — I reject this claim as a grave misunderstanding of current trends. What has been happening is not the banning of books, but the mere removal of them from public school libraries and/or curricula.
“Stifling teachers” is not a thing, really. Taxpayer-funded teachers have no more right to teach anything they want than taxpayer-funded police have the right to enforce whatever laws they want.
The multi-racial backlash against the left, most recently in Virginia, was a movement of parents upset over cultural Marxist indoctrination on racial issues . . . taking the place of quality education.
Something else the Times missed: the extent to which cancel culture has worked hand-in-hand with social media companies under the influence of partisans in Congress and the Deep State.
That being said, the Times does get something right: “When speech is stifled or when dissenters are shut out of public discourse, a society also loses its ability to resolve conflict, and it faces the risk of political violence.”
Yes, it’s a problem.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
—
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
6 replies on “Our Uncivil War”
Cancel culture. Isn’t that what happens in the Kook party when someone says anything negative about Donald Drumpf?
Well, no. You can conjecture that if Trump’s supporters had significant control of academia, of the mainstream of the media, and of the centralized Internet social networks then they would cause people to be dismissed from their jobs and deplatformed. Perhaps that conjecture is correct; but the protasis is counterfactual. Western academia is overwhelmingly in the hands of the political left, as are Western media and major Internet firms. Cancel culture in the West is a left-wing phenomenon.
But, Pam, you already knew all this. You’re just flinging claims in a useless attempt to distract from the ugly truth about your political tribe.
Curious how they categorize their own suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop.
Suppression of free speech by commission is when the NYT prints lies.
By omission is when they refuse to print the truth.
Not sure what to call it when they printed the truth for years talking about the corruption of the Ukrainian government, and then pretend like they never did.
Trump never tells the truth but you accept his lies!
Poor Pam.