Categories
FYI

Citizen-​Only Voting

Paul Jacob, in addition to writing columns five days a week on this website, is the chairman of Americans for Citizen Voting. He recommends these resources to help increase understanding of an important issue on the ballot in eight states across the union.

ACV President Avi McCullah’s “Path To Citizenship”:
ACV-​NC Director Kevrick McKain testifying before NC Senate Re-​Districting and Elections Committee:
MO Treasurer Vivek Malek sets the record STRAIGHT on Noncitizen Voting:
Vote YES on Amendment 7 to Preserve Missouri Election Integrity!
GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on Meet the Press:
Paul Jacob’s columns on non-​citizen voting:

Spilt Ink
October 21, 2024

Democrats and Noncitizen Voting
October 7, 2024

Jugglers & Clowns
July 9, 2024

The Non-​Citizen Dodge
May 28, 2024

More Is Less
March 26, 2024

Alien National Capital
March 7, 2023

Reforms from Ground Zero
January 10, 2022

Ballots, Barriers and Buncombe
September 13, 2021

Should Non-​Citizens Vote?
July 10, 2018

Categories
FYI

He Said the Bad Things (Sure)

In “What Do You Think of Thomas Jefferson? (Trump Asked),” the Fine People on Both Sides calumny against Donald Trump was covered here. Now, let us fact-​check two other infamous Trump sayings.

Dictator on Day One

Repeatedly we hear former president and current presidential candidate Donald John Trump accused of declaring he would be “a dictator on Day One,” and that, therefore, we cannot trust him to respect the Constitution.

Sure. He said it. No doubt. But the original statement was a bit of jesting with Sean Hannity:

Hannity had asked if he would ever use power as retribution against anyone, and Trump responded orthogonally, saying “except for Day One,” then clarifying: he’d close the border and “drill, drill, drill.”

He was answering a different question. This is quite clear. You have to be somewhat illiterate not to understand what Trump was doing here. So can we assume that they really object to is his border policy and petroleum production stance?

Bloodbath!

Trump is charged with threatening a bloodbath if he is not elected. And he did say the word. But the context was also closer to anodyne. He predicted a bloodbath if tariffs in automobiles from Mexico were not raised “100 percent,” which he promised to do:

Now, the ultra-​protectionist policy Trump lays out here may be close to insane. But it’s not threatening-​riots- or threatening-​insurrection-​insane. That is just a fantasy. Of his opponents.

It is worth remembering, also, that there is a difference between a prophecy (or prediction) and a threat (or dire promise).

Categories
FYI

What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? (Trump Asked)

It’s risky, covering the Trump Phenomenon so close to the election and mere hours after the Joe Rogan Experience dropped a much-​awaited interview with the candidate. 

But in the week following an over-​hyped and rather lame October Surprise — the old accusation (from 2022) about Trump griping about not having loyal generals, as Hitler had — it’s worth mention that the most notorious accusations about Trump have fizzled spectaclarly. 

And we’re not talking just about the Russia Collusion nonsense, which early could be spotted as made-​up “oppo research” fantasy. 

Consider just three:

  1. “Very Fine People on Both Sides”
  2. “Dictator on Day One”
  3. “Bloodbath”

In each case we have something Trump actually said (there are few good reasons to be sure about the “Hitler’s loyal generals” comment), but taken completely out of context by his Democratic opposition and by the regular run of news “journalists.”

Let’s take the first accusation today: that Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides” of the August 2017 Charlottesville protests, meaning neo-​Nazis were fine and their counter-​protesters were fine. Everybody’s fine! But, as Snopes​.com explained, Trump meant that there were “very fine people on both sides” of the Confederate statue iconoclasm issue. 

But we know this not just because Snopes said so. Watch Trump’s original statement, but let it run more than ten seconds:

As Snopes summarizes, “He said in the same statement he wasn’t talking about neo-​Nazis and white nationalists, who he said should be ‘condemned totally.’”

Joe Biden has repeatedly claimed that he ran for the presidency primarily because of the sheer awfulness of Trump’s “very fine people” comment, and candidate Kamala Harris has repeated the calumny. While Joe may have a senility excuse, does Kamala?

Meanwhile, something was lost in the brouhaha: it was Trump’s comments on George Washington and Thomas Jefferson that were most interesting. 

Should we take down statuary of the first and third presidents because they owned slaves?

“What do you think of Thomas Jefferson?” Trump asked a reporter. “You like him?”

Trump was clearly more interested in the iconoclasm issue. But Democrats avoid rationally exploring that subject.

Tomorrow: “Dictator on Day One” and “Bloodbath.” And more!

Categories
FYI

Rumors

Every election year rumors fly. Some are shot down.

A recent example? Scuttlebutt had it that presidential candidate Bobby Kennedy had “made a deal” with the Democrats:

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. refuted a Washington Post report from earlier this week that said he would drop out of the race and endorse Vice President Kamala Harris in exchange for a cabinet position if she wins in November.

During an Aug. 15 Latino Town Hall on TikTok, he told the moderators that the story is “fake news.”

“I didn’t ask for a cabinet position,” Kennedy said.

Jeff Louderback, “RFK Jr. Refutes Report That He Approached Harris for a Cabinet Position,” The Epoch Times (August 16, 2024).

This story gets interesting, actually, when we consider what Kennedy goes on to say: that everyone complains about political divisions, but then complains when rivals talk to one another! And who has Kennedy talked to?

“I want to meet with all candidates about dampening down the rhetoric and unifying our country.”

Kennedy said candidates, including former President Donald Trump and Libertarian presidential nominee Chase Oliver, have met with him.

“Kamala Harris said she doesn’t want to [meet],” he said.

Categories
FYI

Body Snatchers?

A multi-​province illegal trade in cadavers has been uncovered in China. “Between 2015 and 2021, Li Zhiqiang, a doctor at The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, allegedly sold around 10 cadavers to Shanxi Osteorad, with the price ranging between 10,000 yuan ($1,395) and 22,000 yuan ($3,070),” The Epoch Times tells us.

“This is something very strange,” explains U.S.-based China commentator Tang Jingyuan, quoted in the article. “In theory, even if the cadavers were from organ donors, Li doesn’t have the right to decide what to do with them, they belong to the families.…

“What’s more, Li dismembered the bodies, froze body parts, and sold them illegally and in secret. Both the bodies and their death were suspicious. How did they die? Why there were no families to claim the bodies?” 

But this appears to be not a story of just one culprit: “Between January 2015 and July 2023, Shanxi Osteorad Biomaterial Co., previously a state-​owned company, and an affiliated firm, allegedly acquired more than 4,300 human cadavers from several funeral homes, a transplant center, and a medical university, to make bone grafting materials.”

Life may be cheap in China. But death apparently pays — third parties?

Note: Image, above, from Robert Wise’s 1945 motion picture, The Body Snatcher, starring Boris Karloff and Bela Lugosi.

Categories
FYI

The Latest Campaign

Propaganda is a funny business. It is not just rhetoric, the art of persuasive speech and writing. It is a mass media affair attempting to influence mass opinion.

We just witnessed the latest variant from the Democrats and major media (but, as the joke goes, we repeat ourselves). The term the propagandists fixated upon was “weird.”

For a week, we heard it everywhere. “Republicans are weird.” “J. D. Vance’s speech was weird.” “They’re just plain weird.”

But social media being what it is, the mass media campaign to characterize the Democrats’ opponents as “weird” was noticed and instantly mocked in multiple venues.

Conservative podcaster Matt Walsh offered his 1412th episode, “Weird Democrats Think The Nuclear Family Is Weird,” making the most common point: folks who advance the outré in sex and culture have no business calling other people weird. Walsh also focuses in on Senator Manchin’s participation in viral talking point, noting that Machin is calling weird Vance’s discussion of the collapse of the family in America. Manchin’s belittling of this topic as “weird” is not even plausible: of course the topic is worth discussing! “This is what it looks like when a talking point unravels.”

Kat Tenbarge covered this yesterday in “Democrats made ‘weird’ an effective weapon, and then Republicans turned it on LGBTQ people,” which the publisher NBC blurbed “‘Weird’ has quickly become one of the most effective political attacks on the internet.” The reader can judge whether “weird” was indeed, an effective, rather than defective, attack.

The use of “weird” by Democrats appears to have come from a July 23 appearance by Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“We do not like what has happened, when you can’t even go to Thanksgiving dinner with your uncle because you end up in some weird fight that is unnecessary,” Walz, who is in contention to be Harris’ vice presidential pick, said. “Well, it’s true. These guys are just weird.”

The quote was sandwiched in between criticisms of former President Donald Trump and his vice presidential nominee JD Vance, who Walz asserted knows “nothing” about “small-​town America.” Walz’s criticism hinged on the right’s focus on culture wars, including its negative characterizations of women without children, its book-​banning efforts and sowing division.

The idea that this spread in a normal viral fashion is probably a stretch though. Memos go out. Ideas are pushed and talking heads on TV are given orders. They have been caught many times, and comedian Dave Smith, in his commentary on the “weird” meme, discussed his own experience catching left-​liberal Democrat commentators and how the biz word — and why they readily conform to the narrowcast of talking point memos.

To innocents who expect people to speak their own minds, the idea of a mass propaganda campaign may be … too weird to accept. “Psychological operations” do not happen. This is just the free flow of ideas!

Well, some ideas just freely flow. But many of the most seemingly viral are indeed coordinated campaigns. And “weird” was (most likely) one.

It probably did not win, though. It was merely the word of the week. Another desperate and mostly ineffective attempt to influence mass opinion.

Or so we can hope.