Royal Society in Disrepute?

Paul Jacob marvels at British scientists on an exclusionary kick.

Elon Musk’s membership in the Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge has been imperiled.

“Thousands of scientists are now calling for Musk’s name to be blotted out from that charter’s fine vellum pages,” explains The Atlantic. “The effort kicked off last summer, when 74 fellows (out of roughly 1,600) sent a letter to the Royal Society’s leadership, reportedly out of concern that Musk’s X posts were fomenting racial violence in the United Kingdom and could therefore bring the institution into disrepute.”

But it’s not just the racial issue. “In November, one of the signatories, the neuropsychologist Dorothy Bishop, resigned from the Royal Society in protest of what she saw as inaction; her statement cited Musk’s derogatory posts about Anthony Fauci and the billionaire’s promotion of misinformation about vaccines.”

Of course the “scientists” are lockstep “for vaccines,” rather than express the least bit of caution about a new therapeutic (Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA injections) that was pushed out to the world with subsidy, legal immunity, and government threats — to treat a disease funded by Fauci himself.

Then another letter made the rounds, signed by more than 3,400 scientists. Elon must go!

But to what extent is it really about money? At the latest Royal Society meeting, worry was expressed that Elon’s DOGE efforts may be cutting off science funding in the United States.

Thankfully, at a recent meeting of the Society, fellows decided not to do anything too precipitous.

So the Royal Society’s members will have to eat their anger, continuing to be associated — for a while, at least — with the dread Elon Musk.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

PDF for printing

Illustration created with Krea and Firefly

—

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

Popular Posts (refresh for more)

Ever Again?
SharingToday marks a solemn anniversary. Seventy-six years ago — on Feb. 22, 1943 — three …
MSNBC Goes Caracas?
SharingExpressing the surprise in some quarters that Venezuelan despot “Maduro …
Awful Aspirations
SharingA funny thing happened on the way to voting on …
America, the Debatable?
Sharing“A divided America gathers for Fourth,” The Washington Post headlined …
Force Over Persuasion
SharingToday’s campus radicals assert that free speech is bad because …

Thought of the Day

We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. If we run into such debts, as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; and the sixteenth being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they now do, on oatmeal and potatoes; have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; but be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains on the necks of our fellow-sufferers. Our landholders, too, like theirs, retaining indeed the title and stewardship of estates called theirs, but held really in trust for the treasury, must wander, like theirs, in foreign countries, and be contented with penury, obscurity, exile, and the glory of the nation. This example reads to us the salutary lesson, that private fortunes are destroyed by public as well as by private extravagance. And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second; that second for a third; and so on, till the bulk of the society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, and to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering. Then begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia, which some philosophers observing to be so general in this world, have mistaken it for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man. And the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Samuel Kercheval (June 12, 1816). The Latin phrase bellum omnium in omnia means “war of all things against all things,” and is Jefferson’s play upon bellum omnium contra omnes, a Latin phrase meaning “the war of all against all,” which is the formulation that Thomas Hobbes gave to human existence in the state of nature in De Cive (1642) and Leviathan (1651). Jefferson is certainly tipping his hat to his friend C.-F. Volney’s concept of this sort of war carried on within modern states, as discussed in The Ruins (1802), the bulk of which Jefferson himself translated from the French.

— Thomas Jefferson

1 reply on “Royal Society in Disrepute?”

Elon Musk should take the initiative and disassociate himself from the Royal Society of close-minded snobs. They are the ones who refuse to acknowledge or even investigate the harm done by the mRNA jabs. They’re obviously not interested in honest inquiry. Musk should wear their rejection as a badge of honor.