The city council of Oakland, California just voted 7 – 1 to end the town’s pandemic-rationalized moratorium on eviction for nonpayment of rent.
But it’s not over yet.
The moratorium will linger on until July 15. Three years is supposedly insufficient time for tenants to gird themselves to again honor the contract with the persons who provide them with shelter.
And then it still won’t be over.
The council’s slow-walk phaseout comes with a permanent new limitation on what landlords can do. This explains the lone dissenting vote, that of Council member Noel Gallo, who says that the rights of landlords are still being insufficiently protected.
As the text of the legislation passed by the council makes clear, its revision of the city’s “just cause” ordinance further violates the property rights of landlords. In part, the new ordinance provides that any failure to pay rent during the last three years which a tenant can plausibly attribute to the pandemic is sufficient to prevent an eviction, even if not relieving the tenant of the obligation to pay that rent.
Will the reprieve be too late and too little for property owners like John Williams? For the last three years, Williams has been stuck with a freeloading tenant who has been financially able to pay rent but who has refused to do so and refused to move.
The tenant, occupying half of the duplex where he also happens to live, owes him $56,000. And Williams is facing … foreclosure.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with PicFinder.ai and DALL-E2
—
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
3 replies on “Rent-Free in Oakland”
These moratoria are takings. Landlords should sue for compensation, invoking the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States.
I doubt that the Oakland City Council ever declared a pandemic-rationalized moratorium on payment of property taxes to the city. The landlord is required to pay those, whether or not the tenant pays rent.
Who is foreclosing — the bank (assuming the landlord holds a mortgage) or the city (for non-payment of property taxes) or both? I learned that the city could seize your land if property taxes aren’t paid.
As a CA resident I have seen this in action. A tenant in my building didn’t pay her rent for 2 years. She used that “extra” money for trips, clothes & other items. I know another guy that didn’t pay his rent & saved it. Put it down on a house out of state.
In Los Angeles you now must either vacate the units or start paying back the monies owed. As long as you make an effort to pay the back rent you can’t lose your rental. There is no stipulation as to how much you must additionally pay above your current monthly.
While there were good people that benefited from this moratorium while they were locked down; there are as many that gamed the system.
The liberality of CA = insanity