“For weeks, legal scholars have debated whether the recall election of [California] Gov. Gavin Newsom could be found unconstitutional,” The Los Angeles Times reports, “if Newsom failed to realize a ‘no recall’ majority of the ballots cast and was ousted by a candidate who received fewer votes than he did.”
By “failed to realize a ‘no recall’ majority,” writer Maura Dolan means — in normal lingo — that Newsom gets booted out of office by majority vote. But following that phrase with “ousted by a candidate who received fewer votes than he did” ignores precisely who just did the “ousting” or, if you prefer, “booting” — voters.
Her confusion was mightily assisted by University of California at Berkeley academics, Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Aaron S. Edlin, economist, arguing in The New York Times that the recall is “nonsensical and undemocratic.” Oh, and “unconstitutional,” too, because more votes could be cast to keep the incumbent than for the incumbent’s replacement.
“Every voter should have an equal ability to influence the outcome of the election,” they contend.
A Golden State recall petition results in two separate elections: (1) the voters’ up-or-down decision on keeping or recalling the official in question, and (2) a second election for voters to choose among candidates running to replace that official should the recall succeed.
Every Californian casting a ballot on these two separate issues indeed has an equal vote. The recall is automatically decided by majority, while the replacement could win with a plurality.
The equal protection angle has been raised unsuccessfully before. In fact, Chemerinsky acknowledged, according to the LA Times, “that courts could decide that the recall proposal itself amounted to a separate election from the second question on the replacement candidates.”
No duh.
The authors should be glad that recalling academics isn’t a thing — even so, they’re not as awful as Governor Newsom.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Blast from the past: This column addressed opposition to the 2003 recall of California Gov. Gray Davis.
Photo by Gage Skidmore
—
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
4 replies on “Recall Legal Scholars?”
Not to mention all the disenfranchised voters that decided to get the heck out of California but have not yet established residency somewhere else.
Just because they were abandoning other Californians to their fate doesn’t mean that they were totally fed up with Newsome specifically.
They might have still voted for him.
Sadly, I know of someone who blamed basically every Californian but himself for the actions of the California Democratic Party, and decided to punish all of us by voting for every tax on the ballot as he prepared to move to another state.
His votes had no marginal effect, but were still rotten.
This is just Libs preparing to not accept the result of any election they ever lose.
It is quite possible for a governor to win the recall vote, though some candidate might receive more votes to be the replacement. Should that occur in this case, expect these academics to monkey-dance to a different tune.