Categories
ideological culture local leaders political challengers

Sans Champion, Again?

Sharing

For a moment there — a few weeks — a comparatively youthful candidate with a gentle, conscientious and respectful temperament seemed poised to challenge the major parties’ sausage-twisting septuagenarians,The Donald and Sleepy Joe. A congressman from Michigan had entered the Libertarian Party’s hat-strewn ring, offering us something serious for Death Race 2020.

Then, Saturday, Rep. Justin Amash sent a series of tweets announcing that he was ending his presidential bid.

Presidential campaigns aren’t easy. And between outrageous anti-democratic ballot access hurdles and the pandemic, it has gotten even more difficult. 

Win or lose — and Amash was going to lose — I’ll miss what the Great Lakes State representative might have gotten a chance to say to audiences across the country. 

About partisanship. 

About political control. 

In Washington. 

“That’s why we have so much discord,” Amash told constituents at a 2019 town hall, “because members of Congress are just following the party line all of the time.”

Party bosses?

“Right now, you have a system in which the Speaker of the House controls the entire process,” charges Amash. “That was true under Republicans and it’s true under Democrats. Under [Speaker] Paul Ryan, for example, we had for the first time in Congress’s history an entire term where we weren’t allowed to amend any legislation on the House floor. 

“And so far under Speaker Pelosi the same thing has happened,” he added. “No amendments have been allowed on the House floor.”

“You need the House to be a deliberative body where everyone participates,” Amash declares, “and everyone has a chance to offer their amendments, to offer their ideas.” 

Great point. 

We sure could use a champion for it.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Rep. Justin Amash, democracy, presidential race,

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

1 reply on “Sans Champion, Again?”

3rd party candidacies are little more than a vanity project. Even the most prominent one, Teddy Roosevelt, couldn’t win. All he accomplished was to split the Republican vote. But then again, his goal was to defeat Taft, so maybe his run was successful, like Perot in 1992. A third party candidate will make an impact if his or her candidacy results in the dissolution of one of the two parties now controlling the strings. Recall that the Republican Party started as a third party and it ended up replacing the Whigs. The two-party system isn’t going away anytime soon. We don’t have a parliamentary form of government. Even so-called ‘independents’ end up caucusing with one of the major parties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *