We have been socialist in Sweden and we have been successful, but never at the same time.
Categories
Johan Norberg
Categories
It Usually Begins with Daniel Shays
On August 29,1786, Shays’ Rebellion — an armed uprising of Massachusetts farmers — began. It was the first tax rebellion after the successful one in 1775–1783, and it so spooked the political leaders of the federal government that they ordered some amendments to the Articles of Confederation — eventually reconfiguring the federation with the U.S. Constitution.
Though the rebellion is named after former revolutionary soldier Daniel Shays (August 1747 – September 29, 1825), his actual role is disputed.
The title atop this page alludes to a 1971 memoir about the libertarian movement by Jerome Tuccille. No offense was intended, and we assume none is taken. Confusion is accepted as a substitute.
I like sports. Even soccer.
That’s why I oppose “transgender women” — biological men, for those playing at home — competing in women’s sports. The physical advantages that men, transgender or not, have over women make such athletic contests inherently unfair.
Worse, from a marketing standpoint: unexciting.
And sometimes dangerous.
Look, women are better than men at a lot of things. Maybe
The problem is one of uncompetitive competition, not hatred of transsexuals. It’s no more anti-trans to forbid men from competing in women’s sports than it is anti-men to limit girls’ sports to biological girls.
“I got a lot of negative feedback about me hating trans,” WNBA star Sophie Cunningham told ESPN. “And I’m like, ‘I never once said that.’
“I think that I am here to extend love. But I also think with that love is truth, being honest,” Cunningham explained. “And I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn’t have to go against biological men.”
What about the reverse? That is, “transgender men” — biological women — competing in men’s sports?
There doesn’t seem to be a big controversy about that. Why not?
It just hasn’t happened, I figured. But I discovered that yes, it has.
Without sparking much controversy, I note. And why? Because in this scenario the transgendered person is at a disadvantage. Punching up, so to speak. Trans men going against bigger, stronger, faster competitors (biologically likely to be, at least) and yet they’re still willing to suit up.
That’s what I love about sports.
This is Common sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with Nano Banana
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts
Ἄλλος γάρ τ’ ἄλλοισιν ἀνὴρ ἐπιτέρπεται ἔργοις.
Each man delights in the work that suits him best.
Homer, The Odyssey, Book XIV (Robert Fagles, trans., 1996), line 228.
Categories
Two Moons & Two Herschels
On August 28, 1789, William Herschel discovered a new moon of Saturn: Enceladus. Over four decades later, the New York penny daily The Sun perpetrated the infamous Great Moon Hoax using Herschel’s son’s name to legitimize its science-fictional “reportage.” The fourth of six installments hit the streets on August 28, 1835, in which “Sir John” tells us of the small, furry human beings with bat-like wings who (from their gesticulations) seemed to be rational. Eventually Richard Adams Locke confessed to having written the work — as “satire.” Edgar Alan Poe accused Locke of plagiarism while The Sun benefitted, on the whole, with increased circulation.
In a case with “serious repercussions,” insists journalist Brazilian-based American journalist Glenn Greenwald, a “U.S. federal judge concluded that an immigration record entered in the Customs and Border Protection system during the Biden administration was fraudulent.”
While the idea of fraudulent behavior in a government bureau will hardly shock you, this record was special. It was used to imprison a
The official? Filipe Martins. He filed suit in the U.S., and as a result a truth came out. “The fraudulent record reflected a non-existent entry into the U.S. by the national security advisor to former President Jair Bolsonaro,” Greenwald explains. “The fabricated entry was then somehow obtained and used by a controversial Brazilian Supreme Court judge to imprison that national security official.”
Behind all this lurks a rogue Brazilian Supreme Court Justice, Alexandre de Moraes. He’s Brazil’s éminence grise, exercising enormous power in his country far beyond his constitutional authority. He’s basically the country’s unacknowledged dictator. He hates free speech, as his run-ins with Twitter (X) and Elon Musk show.
Moraes was gung ho for tyranny during the Biden years, but is justice catching up with this “justice”? U.S. intelligence agencies appear to have secretly nurtured the rogue judge, but with the change of administrations has come an official antagonism.
Now ramped up by a federal judge in the current case — which is “increasingly suspect and bizarre,” as Greenwald notes. “The political implications are obvious: did Biden officials — overtly hostile to the Bolsonaro government and strongly supportive of Lula — deliberately manufacture an immigration record to permit Moraes to order this top-level Brazilian official imprisoned unjustly?”
Americans traditionally think that their government shouldn’t meddle in the internal affairs of foreign states. We certainly shouldn’t allow our government to work sub rosa against freedom around the world.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with Nano Banana
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts
Keep violence in the mind where it belongs.
Brian Aldiss, Barefoot in the Head (1969).
On August 27, 1828, the South American states of Brazil and Argentina recognized the sovereignty of Uruguay in the Treaty of Montevideo.
Do the young think that their trendy-again socialist notions are new?
There’s no hat older than socialism. Our civilization has been grappling with socialist ideas for at least two centuries. While the arguments for and against socialism are many and varied, maybe it all boils down to ignorance and greed.
“This century’s socialist wave starts at a big disadvantage,” wrote Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., for the Wall Street Journal, yesterday. “It arrives as the socialism we already have runs out of that famous quantity, other
Today’s allegedly “democratic” socialists use “the socialism we already have” as an excuse for more. Truth is, we cannot afford what we now must put up with.
“An American baby born today owes $376,000 in federal debt and unfunded entitlement liabilities, assuming the burden is evenly distributed,” explains Mr. Jenkins. “Of course, it isn’t. We oldsters plan on checking out before the bill comes due.”
The intergenerational conflict of actually-existing socialism has been buried under nice phrases like “Social Security” — even as that specific program teeters, insolvent, requiring re-jiggering to ratchet up burdens on the young every other generation.
I see why the young would object. It’s harder to see why they would want more of the dog that bites them.
“Let me be the 1,000th to notice that the New York socialism of Mayor Zohran Mamdani seems to appeal especially to privileged young people, still supported in adulthood by their parents.”
And let me be the millionth to observe that demanding other people do your work and pay your bills amounts to exactly what these very nice socialists have always railed against.
Greed.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with Nano Banana
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts
Οὐ μὲν σχέτλια ἔργα θεοὶ μάκαρες φιλέουσιν,
ἀλλὰ δίκην τίουσι καὶ αἴσιμα ἔργ’ ἀνθρώπων.
The blessed gods have no love for crime.
Homer, The Odyssey, Book XIV (Robert Fagles, trans., 1996), lines 83–84.
They honor justice, honor the decent acts of men.