Author: Redactor

In 1944, two American kids, Ed Jaksha and Bob Wright, hit the beaches of Normandy to save the world. “Never surrender,” Winston Churchill had said. There was no surrender in these freedom-​loving lads, or in thousands more like them.

Fifty years after storming the beaches of Normandy, Jaksha and Wright stormed the parking lots Nebraska to collect signatures on petitions petitions to place term limits on state legislators and members of Congress, to restore citizen control of government the same mission they’d risked their lives for half a century ago. Nebraska officials told them the law required a certain number of signatures.

They got the signatures and the voters passed term limits with 68 percent. But then came a lawsuit. In the end, the state supreme court arbitrarily raised the signature requirement after the fact and threw out the people’s vote for term limits … after all the signatures had been collected the court changed the requirement. Contemptible.

But Jaksha and Wright charged back into action. Even more signatures were gathered and the voters again said yes with a 68 percent vote. Again a lawsuit and again the state supreme court flouted the law and killed term limits. But now the voters had had enough; they booted the judge responsible out of office.

Best of all, Nebraska activists are right now collecting signatures to give the people a third opportunity to enact term limits. These patriots never surrender.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Those poor, poor politicians, they get awfully tired. Dodging the tough issues can wear a body out. And having to pretend to serve the people while pursuing the perks and privileges of a power, well … sometimes it gets to be too much.

So the politicians in Oregon decided to do something about it to tell the pesky citizens to pay their taxes and then “Butt out!” Legislators filed 50 different bills that would in one way or another destroy the citizen initiative process in the state. After all, it was by citizen initiative that the people passed term limits. The politicians would never have done so.

Virtually every other reform you can imagine has only one good chance to become law. Through the legislature? Ha, not on your life. Only through voter initiative can citizens break up the monopoly politicians have created for themselves. The Oregon Legislature placed a measure on this May’s ballot to increase by a whopping 50 percent the petition signatures required to place a voter-​sponsored initiative on the ballot. The supporters of the legislature’s measure admit it will give an advantage to wealthier groups. Even so, a retired state judge said, “It is not a solution, but it would give us a breather.”

A breather? Yes, they want a breather from democracy, so they can better plot removing the people from future decisions. Oh, we’re always happy to give the career politicians a breather. How about term limits?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

When people contribute money to political candidates, I think that’s great. My first thought is that they must agree with the ideas that candidate is campaigning for. But too often career politicians in the Congress show their fundraising efforts are geared to those who want or need to buy influence, not to those who support their general ideas about governance.

Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, the Chairman of the House Republican campaign committee, is under fire from Democrats because he told multi-​billionaire Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft Corporation, that he had not given Republicans enough money, or as Davis put it, “political support.” Bill Gates and his company, Microsoft, have gone through hell in the courts over the past several years for committing the sin of doing better than their competitors in the marketplace.

If Republicans agree that Microsoft is being harmed by arbitrary court action, they shouldn’t need an additional pay-​off from Bill Gates in order to fight for what they believe is right and just. The federal budget should not be a slush fund used by career politicians to reward their friends. Nor should the federal regulatory and police powers be used to threaten political enemies.

But the longer politicians stay in Congress, the more they tend to accept and practice a corrupt doctrine. A doctrine that says the federal government and our tax dollars are theirs to use as clubs to coerce political support. No wonder there’s so much cynicism about Washington.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Wouldn’t it be nice if when you paid your income tax, you could send the money to the programs or projects you thought most important? Here’s one I bet wouldn’t get too many people checking the box: funding the decadent shindigs that we still for some reason call “political conventions.”

This year, Republicans partying in Philadelphia and Democrats celebrating in L.A. will churn through some 26 million of our tax dollars for the all-​important cause of hoopla. The Reform Party will get a few million dollars as well. Yes, we taxpayers are buying balloons, confetti, fancy hors d’oeuvres, liquor and entertainment so the political elite can have a swell time. Somehow having my tax dollars given away to fund party favors for politicians just doesn’t warm my heart the way making a donation to a local charity does.

Some will say, “Oh, it’s only a trifling $26 million smackers. What’s the big deal? In a $1.8 trillion budget, that’s nothing.” But you know, a million here and a million there and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.

To take the fruit of someone’s labor away from them is bad enough. But to take it away to fund extravagant parties for a special elite group is a special insult added to injury. My Mother used to say, “Don’t be a party pooper.” Well, sorry Ma, I really don’t have anything against someone having a party; it’s just that when I’m paying the bills, I’m cheap.

At least, cheaper than politicians.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Career politicians always tell us how long it takes to learn the ropes, to climb the seniority ladder and “get things done.” In a recent debate, a candidate for Congress refused to make a term limits pledge saying he thought it would take him 17 years to gain enough seniority to be effective. In other words, just elect and reelect me eight times and then look out because maybe I’ll finally get around to doing something.

Of course, too often what the career politicians call “getting things done” is often better described as pork-​barreling for fun and political profit. For instance, Rep. Doug Bereuter of Nebraska, a 22-​year incumbent, candidly admits what he and fellow GOP careerists are up to this year, [quote] “avoiding political difficulties and helping constituencies that are favorable.”

In other words, they’re using our tax dollars to reward their supporters and win votes. That’s what they’re getting done. Sound noble to you?

But Rep. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, a freshman, is getting things done right now. He just passed legislation to take $4 billion of the surplus out of the hands of congressional politicians, and instead use it to pay down the national debt. Long-​serving members were amazed that a freshman could get such an important bill passed.

Why is Toomey getting things done instead of just marking time? Well, he has no time to waste. He pledged to go to Washington for a short period of public service, three terms, not a career. So waiting around isn’t part of his plan.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

Our Constitution begins with the words “We the People.” Was that just a typo?

I ask because David Broder, the Washington Post reporter, has written a book attacking the right of voters to enact laws directly through the initiative process. Broder argues that the process destroys representative government, has no constitutional restraint, and is corrupted by special interests.

Should we fear initiatives? Our Constitution protects us from laws that abridge our rights whether passed by voters or imposed by politicians. But in reality, initiatives are regularly struck down by the same courts that regularly give a free pass to acts of the legislature.

What about corruption? There’s a long, ugly history of legislators taking bribes and doing the bidding of special interests. But can special interests pay off an entire city, an entire state? Get real, Broder. Power corrupts men, but an initiative, a piece of paper, cannot be corrupted.

So why the antagonism for initiatives? Broder, like most of elite Washington, opposes term limits and tax reforms that have come about almost exclusively through the citizen initiative process. If you don’t like it when people regain control over their own lives and their own government, you won’t like initiatives.

Broder doesn’t think much of the average voter. Let career politicians decide all. Dane Waters of the Initiative & Referendum Institute admits that no lawmaking process is perfect, but asks, “If the people can’t be trusted, who can?”

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.