All cultures are not equal. Or at least they are not equal in preparing people to be productive in an advanced economy.
Co-authors Amy Wax and Larry Alexander of “Paying the price for breakdown of the country’s bourgeois culture,” The Inquirer (August 9, 2017), an article that caused a huge backlash against Dr. Wax at her institution, the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Immediately following the above-quoted passage, the article continued:
The culture of the Plains Indians was designed for nomadic hunters, but is not suited to a First World, 21st-century environment. Nor are the single-parent, antisocial habits, prevalent among some working-class whites; the anti-“acting white” rap culture of inner-city blacks; the anti-assimilation ideas gaining ground among some Hispanic immigrants. These cultural orientations are not only incompatible with what an advanced free-market economy and a viable democracy require, they are also destructive of a sense of solidarity and reciprocity among Americans. If the bourgeois cultural script — which the upper-middle class still largely observes but now hesitates to preach — cannot be widely reinstated, things are likely to get worse for us all.
Would the re-embrace of bourgeois norms by the ordinary Americans who have abandoned them significantly reduce society’s pathologies? There is every reason to believe so. . . .
1 reply on “Amy Wax & Larry Alexander”
This is right on, but omits one 1960s cause of the decline in values. Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society programs legitimized parental irresponsibilty with support for children born out of wedlock. Father figures are absent from many households, leaving boys (who are told that racism blocks their future) to seek role models in street gangs — the dirty litlle secret of the left.