On Tuesday Marsha Blackburn, the senior United States senator from Tennessee, asked Judge Jackson a simple question: “Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman’?” Jackson, a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College and sometime supervising editor of the Harvard Law Review answered: “Can I provide a definition? No. I can’t. Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.” The judge, brow furrowed, seemed equal parts annoyed and genuinely confused.
Declan Leary, “I’m Not a Biologist,” The American Conservative, March 26, 2022, relating a moment in Judge Jackson’s interrogation by the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on her nomination to the Supreme Court.
Categories
Ketanji Brown Jackson
One reply on “Ketanji Brown Jackson”
Judge Jackson implicitly conceeded that the definition of “woman” was biologic, rather than a matter of what a person selected for him- or herself. If I’m going to fault her answer, I would only say that she should have explicitly declared the issue to be biologic, except in legislation that overtly redefined the term “woman” for purpose of law.
Had I been asked, my answer would have been “an adult, biologically female member of the genus Homo, in our era presumably a member of the species Homo sapiens”.
Had I then, to clarify that definition, been asked what made a member biologically female, I would have felt a need to raise the issue of de la Chapelle Syndrome, a very rare condition of having two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome, but having phenotypic characteristics associated with being male, sometimes with no ambiguities.
Did Jackson know anything about de la Chapelle Syndrome? I’d guess not; she wasn’t a biologist.