Common Sense with Paul Jacob

“Just one day before the [Senate] hearing, likely for preemptive damage control purposes, the FDA quietly updated its myocarditis warning on Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, expanding the risk category to males aged 16 to 25 and citing an incidence of 8 cases per million doses for the 2023–2024 formulations,” Nicolas Hulscher wrote on Thursday for Focal Points. “Unfortunately, no mention of death was added — despite robust, peer-reviewed autopsy evidence confirming fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

Hulscher’s short article focuses on the testimony of Dr. Peter McCullough at the hearing, which was held on Wednesday.

In direct response to claims made by Senator Richard Blumenthal during the hearing that COVID-19 vaccines saved millions of lives, Dr. McCullough was unequivocal: “I don’t want America to be fooled by this hearing today thinking that the vaccines saved lives — because they didn’t.”

Dr. McCullough’s testimony was clear, data-driven, and difficult to ignore.

He made the case that public health agencies minimized known harms, failed to act on early warning signs, and still have not provided the public with full transparency.

The hearing was the first Senator Ron Johnson conducted as the new chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. The senator began by asserting that the Biden administration had known about the mRNA “vaccines’” myocarditis problem early, but kept mum.

“Johnson released newly subpoenaed records exposing a detailed timeline of what officials knew and when,” The Vigilant Fox summarizes on Substack. “While Pfizer and Moderna received insider updates, doctors and citizens who raised concerns were silenced.”

In February 2021, Israeli health officials warned the CDC of “large reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people” following Pfizer injections, just two and a half months after the vaccine received emergency use authorization.

By April, the CDC was already reviewing myocarditis data from Israel and the Department of Defense. But instead of alerting the public, they stayed quiet.

It now seems possible that the full truth about the coronavirus pandemic will come out, though few if any insiders are likely to be brought to justice.

“New Hampshire joins a growing list of states that mandate some level of local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement,” The Epoch Times tells us.

New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed a pair of bills into law that ban so-called “sanctuary” policies designed to keep local police from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

“There will be no sanctuary cities in New Hampshire,” Ayotte declared at the bill-signing ceremony, flanked by lawmakers and sheriffs from across the state. “Period. End of story.”

At issue are two bill, HB511 and SB62. These curb local governments under the corporate control of the sovereign state from defying federal law on the matter of immigration — that is, “unless expressly prohibited by state or federal law, local governmental entities may not prohibit or impede any state or federal law enforcement agency from complying with federal immigration laws,” etc.

“New Hampshire now joins a growing list of states that have enacted anti-sanctuary laws,” The Epoch Times goes on to explain. “According to legal advocacy group Immigrant Legal Resource Center, more than 20 states, including Alabama, Florida, Texas, and Georgia, have laws mandating at least some level of local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.”

The idea of the state nullification of federal law — James Madison called it “interposition,” and it was a key idea of the early Jeffersonians — has been on the rise in recent years. (Cannabis legalization is a good example.) This movement of the states to rein in the “sanctuary city” movement goes in the other direction, forcing compliance with the federal government.