Categories
Update

Blight Flight

Jacinda Adern, former prime minister of New Zealand, no longer lives in New Zealand. She and her family have been traveling. First to America, to teach, and then to Australia. Why?

Some say it’s a long story:

In 2017, Ardern became the world’s youngest-serving female leader, aged 37, and went on to make history as the second woman to give birth while holding elected office.

Over the next six years, her leadership was defined by a series of national and international crises including the Christchurch attack and Covid pandemic. At a time when major western powers were lurching to the right, Ardern’s brand of politics made her a global icon of the left.

Towards the end of her time in office, Ardern’s legacy at home became more complicated, and she faced criticism over her government’s failure to make headway on its promises to fix the housing crisis and meaningfully reduce emissions. As the pandemic wore on, a small but vocal fringe of anti-vaccine and anti-mandate groups emerged, leading to a violent protest on parliament’s lawns and threatening rhetoric directed at Ardern.

Eva Corlett, The Guardian (February 25, 2026).

But it’s not just Adern exiting Kiwi country. Many have moved westward to Australia. Why the flight? The BBC implicitly blames an inexplicably bad economy, in “Jacinda Ardern’s move to Australia renews spotlight on New Zealand’s brain drain problem” (March 2, 2026). That “brain drain” characterization seems, in relation to Adern, perhaps a bit comic.

The New York Times continues in this vein of taking note of a significant trend without considering the obvious: Ms. Adern doesn’t feel welcome in her home country any more because she messed it up so astoundingly. She abused power; acted like a tyrant.

But the Times does mention that Ms. Adern has had a book published — a common reward for stellar service against the interests of the people — called (we kid you not) A Different Kind of Power.

Ms. Adern has appeared in these pages before, usually in relation to COVID. She was a strident covidian.

Categories
Update

The Predatory Congress Protected

The perverts, rapists and bullies in Congress showed their true colors this week — and the colors? Neither “red” nor “blue”: instead, full spectrum. That is, very bipartisan:

In a controversial move, 357 members of Congress, including 175 Republicans and 182 Democrats, voted to refer a resolution that would have forced the release of records related to sexual harassment claims against lawmakers to a committee, effectively killing the measure. The resolution, proposed by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, aimed to direct the House Committee on Ethics to publicly release all records of investigations into members of Congress for sexual harassment, unwelcome sexual advances, and sexual assault. Critics argue this vote is an attempt to cover up misconduct and protect predators in Congress.

“Congress Votes to Keep Sexual Harassment Settlement Records Secret,” National Today (March 6, 2026).

Thomas Massie (R-Tenn.) insists that everyone who voted to “refer” the resolution did so knowing that their voted effectively killed it. He listed the names of the few good guys on X:

Representative Mace was not amused by the weak showing:

WASHINGTON, D.C. (Mar. 4, 2026) — Today, Congresswoman Nancy Mace (R-SC) issued the following statement after both Republicans and Democrats voted to kill her resolution which would have forced the public release of Congressional sexual harassment records.

“Both parties colluded today to protect predators. They voted to keep sexual harassment records buried, and they did it together.

“Every Member who voted against this resolution voted to protect the cover-up instead of the victims.

“This is the establishment in action, always protecting itself, never the victims. Ask yourself why. Remember their names when they ask for your vote.

We don’t want to hear a single Member who voted this resolution down utter the name of a single Epstein victim. You don’t get to bury sexual harassment records in Congress and then pretend you care about victims. Pick a side.

“The victims deserved better. The American people deserved better. Every Member who voted to keep these records buried voted to protect power over people. We won’t let it go and neither should you.”

Office of Congresswoman Nancy Mace (March 4, 2026).

Paul Jacob has written about the protected creeps in Congress, for this is not a new issue by any means.

Categories
Update

Gender Theory Criticism & Free Speech

The woke war on freedom of speech continues in Canada. 

In mid-February 2026, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ruled that Barry Neufeld’s repeated public criticisms of the province’s SOGI 123 program (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity resources used in schools) constituted hate speech and discrimination against 2SLGBTQ+ individuals, particularly transgender people. Mr. Neufeld, a former school board trustee in Chilliwack, British Columbia, was ordered to pay $750,000 in damages to affected teachers in the Chilliwack Teachers’ Association who identify as LGBTQ+ (covering the period from October 2017 to 2022), citing harm to their dignity, feelings, and self-respect.

Neufeld’s comments began around 2017 when British Columbia updated school codes to address bullying based on sexual orientation and gender identity. In various Facebook posts, interviews, and public statements over several years, he described SOGI as a “weapon of propaganda” promoting the “absurd theory” that gender is a social construct rather than biologically determined. He also claimed that allowing children to change gender amounted to “child abuse,” warned that teaching about gender diversity “undermines social order and primes them for abuse,” and invoked stereotypes portraying transgender people as predatory or mentally ill.

Neufeld plans to challenge the ruling, arguing it violates his freedom of expression.

The woke war on speech wokels is not confined to Mr. Neufeld, alas:

Amy Hamm, a nurse in British Columbia, faced a lengthy disciplinary hearing before the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives after complaints about her off-duty online statements between 2018 and 2021. She argued that biological sex is immutable, criticized gender ideology as harmful to women and children (e.g., allowing men into women’s spaces like prisons or sports), and identified herself as a nurse in some posts. A panel found six statements discriminatory and derogatory toward transgender people, ruling they constituted professional misconduct with a sufficient nexus to her profession due to potential harm to patient trust. In March 2025, she was deemed guilty; in August 2025, she was suspended for one month and ordered to pay $93,639.80 in costs to the college. Hamm appealed the decision to the B.C. Supreme Court, arguing it infringed on her freedom of expression, with the penalty stayed pending resolution.

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at NHS Fife, in Scotland, was suspended in 2024 after complaining about sharing a female changing room with Dr. Beth Upton, a transgender doctor (biologically male) who had permission to use it. Peggie expressed discomfort based on her belief that sex is biological and immutable, citing privacy and dignity concerns. She faced an 18-month internal gross misconduct investigation, during which she was barred from work. Cleared of misconduct in July 2025, she sued NHS Fife and Upton for discrimination, harassment, and victimization under the Equality Act 2010. In a December 2025 employment tribunal ruling, her harassment claim against NHS Fife was partially upheld on four grounds (e.g., the board’s failure to revoke Upton’s access temporarily during investigation), criticizing the board’s handling as creating a “hostile” environment. However, claims of direct/indirect discrimination and victimization were dismissed, as were all claims against Upton personally. A remedy hearing is pending, and Peggie plans to appeal the dismissals.

Päivi Räsänen, a Finnish MP and former interior minister, faced multiple hate speech charges for expressing Christian-based views skeptical of gender theory and same-sex relationships. Key statements included a 2019 tweet questioning her church’s support for Pride events (citing Bible verses on gender as binary and divinely created), a 2004 pamphlet arguing homosexuality contradicts “God’s design” for male-female complementarity, and a 2019 radio interview criticizing gender ideology. Prosecutors argued these incited hatred against LGBTQ+ people under Finland’s criminal code. After acquittals in district court (2022) and appeals court (2023), the Supreme Court acquitted her unanimously in 2024, ruling her statements were protected speech not amounting to hate. However, she endured years of investigations, trials, and appeals, describing it as a “chilling” ordeal that tested free expression limits in Europe.

Paul Jacob has written about the Finnish case a couple of times.

Categories
Update

Epstein File Consequences

The disclosure of the Epstein Files has led to nothing much along the lines of legal consequences in America, while in Europe there have been several arrests, resignations, and investigations tied directly to revelations of ties to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. The list at present:

  • Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (United Kingdom; former royal and Duke of York): Arrested February 19, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to sharing sensitive trade information with Epstein while serving as a U.K. trade envoy; in 2025, stripped of royal titles in response to ongoing Epstein scrutiny.
  • Peter Mandelson (United Kingdom; former government minister, European Commissioner, and U.K. Ambassador to the U.S.): Arrested February 23, 2026, on suspicion of misconduct in public office; released on bail pending further investigation; previously dismissed from his ambassadorship in September 2025, resigned from the House of Lords and Labour Party in early February 2026.
  • Thorbjørn Jagland (Norway; former Prime Minister, Nobel Committee chair, and Council of Europe Secretary General): Charged with aggravated corruption in mid-February 2026 following home searches linked to Epstein file disclosures; faces up to ten years in prison if convicted.
  • Terje Rød-Larsen (Norway; former diplomat, Minister of Administration and Planning, and International Peace Institute president): Under investigation for complicity in gross corruption tied to his Ministry of Foreign Affairs work and Epstein contacts; suspended from duties.
  • Mona Juul (Norway; former ambassador to the U.K., Jordan, Iraq, and U.N. Economic and Social Council president; wife of Terje Rød-Larsen): Resigned as ambassador to Jordan and Iraq in early February 2026; under investigation for aggravated corruption.
  • Jack Lang (France; former Minister of Culture and Education, president of the Arab World Institute): Resigned as head of the Arab World Institute in early February 2026; under financial investigation related to Epstein ties.
  • Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem (United Arab Emirates; magnate and chairman/CEO of DP World logistics company): Replaced as chairman and CEO on February 13, 2026, after emails revealed a years-long friendship with Epstein.
  • Miroslav Lajčák (Slovakia; former U.N. General Assembly president and national security adviser): Resigned as national security adviser to Prime Minister Robert Fico on January 31, 2026, after photos and emails showed post-conviction meetings with Epstein.
  • Joanna Rubinstein (Sweden; chair of Sweden for UNHCR): Resigned in early February 2026 after documents revealed a 2012 visit to Epstein’s private island post-conviction.
  • Børge Brende (Norway; former foreign minister and World Economic Forum president): Stepped down as WEF president in early February 2026 following an independent investigation into his Epstein contacts.
  • Mohamed Waheed Hassan (Maldives; special envoy to the president): Resigned positions in early February 2026 amid scrutiny over Epstein communications.
  • Sarah Ferguson (United Kingdom; former Duchess of York): Forced to shutter her charity, Sarah’s Trust, in early February 2026 due to reputational damage from Epstein associations; effectively resigned from her public role in the organization.
  • Morgan McSweeney (United Kingdom; chief of staff to Prime Minister Keir Starmer): Resigned in early February 2026 amid fallout from Mandelson’s scandal and broader government scrutiny.
  • Tim Allan (United Kingdom; communications director for Prime Minister Keir Starmer): Resigned in early February 2026 as part of the U.K. government’s Epstein-related shakeup.

Take some caution, however: being named in the files does not inherently prove wrongdoing, and of course many individuals have denied illicit involvement. This list focuses on non-U.S. figures who have faced negative reactions to the information, actions like arrests, firings, forced resignations, or criminal charges. Some of these reactions are likely over-reactions. Whatever evil that Jeffrey Epstein was up to, he also was involved in networking with nearly everybody. How many of his “friends” he enticed into sexual activity with girls, or worse, and how many had no clue or just hints, we do not know.

Categories
Update

Clots of the Clot Shot?

“This can’t be hidden for too much longer.”

Dr. John Campbell, “White clot science” (February 21, 2026).

It has been some time since the last report, in these pages, about the appearance of long, white, rubbery, fibrous clots in the veins of the recently dead . . . as found by morticians around the world. Now, finally, studies have been done, and published — if not in major journals.

In “Press Release: Breaking Research Decodes the Mystery of “The Rubbery White Clots,” we learn that new studies have “for the first time comprehensively characterised the anomalous intravascular casts (AICs) commonly reported by embalmers worldwide as strange, rubbery white clots.

The research, significantly funded by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) and conducted by New Zealand-based researchers Drs Bruce Rapley and Matt Shelton, provides definitive analysis that these structures are a previously unrecognised and abnormal form of intravascular clotting.

Since 2021, global reports from embalmers and some clinicians have described the retrieval of long, elastic, white fibrous structures from blood vessels, distinct from ordinary post-mortem clots.

“NZDSOS has been at the forefront of raising concerns about these anomalous findings. This new three-part study using international labs on three continents describes their structure, elemental composition and protein makeup, concluding they represent a novel and persistent pathological entity”, said Dr Shelton. 

The three papers tackle distinct issues with the tissues:

Obviously well worth further study, as the press release goes on to say.

But remember: this clot situation is not anodyne: “This is not just a big blood clot,” insists Senior Researcher Dr Bruce Rapley. “This is a fundamentally different architecture. The profound deficiency in plasminogen is like building a structure impervious to future demolition — it’s designed to persist. The elemental data confirms it’s not just protein; it’s a hybrid material our bodies are forced to make but not equipped to clear.”

Of course, the heroic Dr. John Campbell explains it well:

Categories
Update

What Odd Things to Say?

On Brian Tyler Cohen’s “No Lie” podcast, released around February 14, 2026, in a Q&A segment towards the end, Barack Obama fielded a question about “aliens.” Are they real?

They’re real, but I haven’t seen them. And they’re not being kept in . . . what is it? Area 51.

While Area 51 has become the default punchline in media (thanks to movies, memes, and the 2019 “Storm Area 51” viral event), serious UFO researchers and whistleblower claims (from Bob Lazar’s talks with Nevada newsman George Knapp to David Grusch’s 2023 congressional testimony) almost always point elsewhere for alleged crash retrievals and “biologics.”

Main target?

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base — specifically the “Hangar 18” myth, popularized in the 1970s by figures like Robert Spencer Carr. The site is also tied to Roswell debris allegedly being shipped there post-1947, with reverse-engineering and body storage rumors persisting in books and eyewitness accounts. Other locations pop up variably (Dugway, Los Alamos, etc.), but Wright-Pat edges out Area 51 in many traditional narratives for the “bodies” angle.

And, according to lore, comedian Jackie Gleason (a known UFO enthusiast) reportedly told his then-wife Beverly McKittrick that President Richard Nixon, a golfing buddy, drove him late one night in February 1973 to Homestead Air Force Base in Florida. There, Gleason allegedly viewed embalmed alien bodies (small, about two feet long, with big heads/ears) in a secure building — possibly recovered from a crash or retrieval. The tale surfaced publicly via Beverly after their divorce. It’s often retold. And it adds a Florida candidate for an inventory of “dead aliens,” not the infamous Nevada site.

This all sounds far-fetched, and Obama tried immediately to throw water on the flame:

There’s no underground facility, unless there’s this enormous conspiracy, and they hid it from the president of the United States.

Of course, the military has scads of underground facilities, so the “enormous conspiracy” caveat seems almost designed to fan the flames, not quench them. How many more votes just switched to Enormous Conspiracy?

Later, Obama tried to walk it further back:

He followed up with statistical reasoning about the vast universe making life probable, emphasizing no evidence of contact or hidden bodies during his presidency (and later clarified on social media that he saw “no evidence” of extraterrestrials making contact).

But the story did not stop with the former president.

Fox White House Correspondent Peter Doocy: Barack Obama said that aliens are real. Have you seen any evidence of non-human visitors to Earth?

President Donald J. Trump: Well, he gave classified information. He’s not supposed to be doing that, you know.

Doocy: So, aliens are real.

Trump: Well, I don’t know if they’re real or not. I can tell you he gave classified information. He’s not supposed to be doing that. He made — He made a big mistake. He took it out of classified information. No, I don’t — I don’t have an opinion on it. I never talk about it. A lot of people do. A lot of people believe it. Do you believe it, Peter? 

Doocy: Well, the president can declassify anything that he wants to. So . . .

Trump: . . . I may get him out of trouble by declassify[ing].

Q&A at the steps of Air Force One, February 19, 2026.

What an odd way to respond.

But the oddities aren’t decreasing:

What will Trump do, though — and what is he up against?

Categories
Update

Oregon Medicaid Fraud?

Defrauding the welfare state is not just a Minnesota practice. A developing story about a vaporous business near Portland, Oregon, linked to Medicaid fraud, kidnapping and torture, Venezuelan gang activity, and a pastor serving East Africans in America:

Oregon Roundup Foundation reported last summer OHA paid Uplifting Journey $2.3 million in drug and alcohol treatment Medicaid reimbursements for reported dates of service from April 15, 2024 to March 14, 2025. In January of this year, Washington prosecutors charged one man who allegedly lived in a Lake Oswego, Oregon house operated by Uplifting Journey with kidnapping, torturing and attempting to murder a Seattle area woman. Prosecutors allege another man living in the house participated in the crimes, but has not been apprehended.

Oregon Roundup Foundation reported last week Arizona pastor Theodore Mucuranyana, accused of laundering millions originating from a $60 million Arizona Medicaid fraud ring, co-signed for Uplifting Journey on a lease for a house to serve as a residential treatment facility in Gresham, Oregon in November 2024. Mucuranyana pastors the Hope of Life International Church, which caters to east African congregants in the Phoenix, Arizona area. The Arizona Attorney General alleges Mucuranyana funneled some of the fraudulent proceeds to an entity in Rwanda.

Jeff Eager, “Health Authority withheld plea for “scrutiny” of Uplifting Journey” (December 14, 2025).

The same reporter appears to be alone on the coverage (it’s hard to find anyone else). His last relevant post on his Substack site was in early February, basically informing us of the latest. The upshot? Little due diligence had been done by a government eager to give millions out in grants:

Oregon Health Authority chose to forego criminal background checks and site visits when it approved Uplifting Journey LLC to receive Medicaid reimbursements and subsequently paid the company at least $2.3 million, according to an agency spokesperson. One Uplifting Journey owner, Espoir Ntezeyombi, is a business associate of a man charged by Arizona’s Attorney General with orchestrating a $60 million Medicaid fraud scheme, an Oregon Roundup Foundation investigation found. . . .

Uplifting Journey told OHA it would provide services at an address on N Broadway in Portland. An August visit during business hours showed the office apparently closed, with a paper sign on the door and mattresses and full plastic trash bags in the space. Because OHA chose the lightest level of scrutiny for Uplifting Journey, OHA was not required to conduct a site visit of the Portland location.

Jeff Eager, “OHA: No Uplifting Journey Background Checks” (February 3, 2026).

The story has its lurid elements; nevertheless, those elements have yet to entice much press notice. That Pastor Theo Mucuranyana linkage — the headlines almost write themselves! It’s almost as if the old days of Yellow Journalism — where Story was All — have been replaced with the present days of propagandistic pfiffle . . . and nothing but the pfiffle. If the news doesn’t serve the State and its ever-metastasizing growth, then the news remains unstated.

Categories
Update

A Very Epstein “Meet Cute”?

It’s Valentine’s Day, and time to acknowledge that the First Couple have a contested “meet cute” story. 

The official story?

Donald Trump and Melania Knauss (now Trump) first met in September 1998 at a New York Fashion Week party hosted by Paolo Zampolli, an Italian modeling agent and businessman who had signed Melania to his agency (ID Models) earlier that year. Zampolli has consistently claimed credit for the introduction, and both Donald and Melania Trump have publicly corroborated this account over the years, including in Melania’s 2024 memoir Melania (where she describes the meeting at the Kit Kat Club). At the time, Trump was 52 and still legally married to Marla Maples (their divorce finalized in 1999), though he attended the event with another date, Norwegian heiress Celina Midelfart. Melania, then 28, reportedly refused to give Trump her number initially but called him later, leading to their first date.

But that is not how Whitney Webb tells the tale.

Author of the two-volume One Nation Under Blackmail (2022), Ms. Webb has appeared on several podcasts noting that Jeffrey Epstein’s modeling ties (via Ghislaine Maxwell’s recruitment and Les Wexner’s Victoria’s Secret empire) allowed Epstein to leverage “beautiful women” for influence, including potential matchmaking. She has alleged Epstein’s operations included procuring young women for elite men, sometimes under the guise of legitimate modeling or social introductions, naming Melania as having been “allegedly” introduced to Trump by Epstein.

So where are such allegations?

In the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) release of over 3.5 million pages of Epstein-related documents in phases starting in late 2025, culminating in a massive January 30, 2026, dump, as mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed by the president. These include FBI interviews, emails, flight logs, and much more from investigations into Epstein’s sex trafficking as well as Ghislaine Maxwell’s 2020–2022 trial.

An 11-page FBI report from August 2025 quotes a former Epstein assistant (who worked for him 2005–2006) stating that Epstein “introduced MELANIA TRUMP to DONALD TRUMP.” This directly contradicts the Zampolli story and suggests Epstein played a matchmaking role. The assistant’s identity is redacted.

Not so cutely met. If true. 

Melania and Donald married on January 22, 2005.

Categories
Update

Pizzagate Redux?

The big news this past week has been the info dump — over a million files! — regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The story is mainly chaos right now. But Matt Kibbe’s interview of Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who is chiefly responsible for this ungainly disclosure, offers an interesting perspective on the mess. He makes a good case that blackmail was not the chief method of Mr. Epstein:

For a deeper dive, consider Tucker Carlson’s discussion of “pizza and grape juice” (and other oddities found in the release of data) with the notorious Ian Carroll:

Kim Iverson quotes the original Pizzagate researcher, Ben Swann:

It is quite a story, unfolding before our eyes. Sort of. And it reviving the Pizzagate story isn’t outré enough, why not reconsider the question of whether Jeffrey Epstein is really dead?

But what do the files say? The above appraisal does not analyze all the purported postmortem photos available:

There are a lot of issues to deal with regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. One issue hanging out there, like a matzo ball: Epstein claimed to be an agent of the Rothschilds.

Categories
Update

The President Comments on Poorly-Run Cities

“I have instructed Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, that under no circumstances,” Trump posted on Truth Social, “are we going to participate in various poorly run Democrat Cities with regard to their Protests and/or Riots unless, and until, they ask us for help.” 

“Later Saturday night, Trump said to reporters as he flew to Florida for the weekend,” explains the Associated Press, “that he felt Democratic cities are ‘always complaining.’

“‘If they want help, they have to ask for it. Because if we go in, all they do is complain,’ Trump said.”

But that doesn’t mean federal property won’t be protected. “We will, however, guard, and very powerfully so, any and all Federal Buildings that are being attacked by these highly paid Lunatics, Agitators, and Insurrectionists.”

But does that include vehicles? A video of a man who looked like Alex Pretti — who was shot on the 24th of January by Border Patrol agents — surfaced last week, showing the protester kicking the right-rear lights of an ICE vehicle. Though many suspected the video to be AI, it has been confirmed by Pretti’s parents as of their son. The video-recorded event took place on the 13th, according to The Epoch Times

Trump addressed this video directly in a Truth Social post, where he claimed that Pretti’s “stock has gone way down” due to the footage of him “screaming and spitting in the face of a very calm and under control ICE Officer, and then crazily kicking in a new and very expensive government vehicle, so hard and violent, in fact, that the taillight broke off in pieces.” Trump called Pretti an “agitator and, perhaps, insurrectionist.”

The post has been widely reported in major legacy media stories.