Categories
Accountability government transparency national politics & policies

One Day an Audit?

Paul Jacob on finding out what’s in Fort Knox.

“As U.S. debt soars and foreign central banks stockpile gold,” asserts a new article, “a U.S. senator today introduced a bill to require the first comprehensive audit of America’s gold reserves in decades.”

Reading the Mises Institute piece, I got a sense of déjà vu.

“Sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee (R‑UT), the Gold Reserve Transparency Act would require a full assay, inventory, and audit of all United States gold holdings,” the author, Jp Cortez, explains, “along with an upgrade in the purity of the gold so that it meets global market standards.”

The “haven’t I read this before?” thought hit me hard. Talk of auditing the gold reserves is not new. Earlier this year, in the heady days of Elon Musk and DOGE, a lot of folks dared wonder: does the federal government even have any gold at all? 

I asked the question in February, in the context (I kid you not) of UFOs!

A “Gold Reserve Transparency Act” has been introduced four times in the House since 2011, always by Republican sponsors aligned with sound-​money advocates. But it has also never passed the House, let alone advanced to the Senate or become law. 

The House Committee on Financial Services received these bills but only the 2011 version got so much as a hearing. 

No Senate version existed until Sen. Mike Lee’s introduction (S. _​_​, 119th Congress) weeks ago, which mirrors the House bill and remains unnumbered and in committee as of yesterday.

A gold audit would be very interesting. But I get the feeling this will be treated like UFOs: full disclosure forever forthcoming.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with ChatGPT/​NanoBanana/​Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

3 replies on “One Day an Audit?”

On the assumption that the Federal government still possesses that gold, the benefits of demonstrating possession would be rather great and the costs relatively low. I infer, therefore, that the assumption is false. 

One may easily imagine a bit of gold pinched-​off here-​and-​there, for this-​or-​that purpose, until the conversion was so out-​of-​control that any proper audit would detect it. At that point, the rule is In for a buck, in for a bundle, and the gold is shovelled out the door.

Is this really Deja vu, or is it more like Jamais vu; the feeling that something is unreal or unusual, whilst at the same time knowing it is something you are very familiar with. What are we feeling when we read about an audit of the gold reserves? Ah, the government, and we are very familiar with the lies we’ve been told by said government. Yes, we “…get the feeling this will be treated like UFOs.” Something unreal or unusual, whilst at the same time knowing it is something we are very familiar with.

Does anyone really believe the gold is actually there?
If they do audit the gold, and that’s a big if, they need to audit ALL locations at the same time. That way if there is actually some gold left, they can’t move it from one location to another and end up counting the same items multiple times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *