“Sometimes it is to regain by the sword what had been unjustly taken from the rightful possessor: Sometimes to prevent impending dangers, which cannot be avoided by other means: But, for the most part, it is undertaken to gratify the ambition of a prince, who wishes to subject to his arbitrary will a people whom God created free, and to gain an uncontrolled dominion over their rights and property.”
Voters in yesterday’s Indiana Republican Primary made history. U.S. Senator Richard Lugar became only the second senator in history with 36 years or more of incumbency to be defeated in his own party’s primary.
It wasn’t close, either — State Treasurer Richard Mourdock trounced Lugar, winning three of every five votes.
During the race, Sen. Lugar’s residency problem became clear: he hadn’t actually lived in Indiana since 1976. Voters tend to dislike the same person wielding power for four decades and only visiting, now and then, the people he represents.
Nor did it help being tagged “President Obama’s favorite Republican.”
But more substantial issues also mattered. Lugar voted for the TARP bailout. He opposed full Second Amendment rights. He voted to raise taxes and jack up the debt ceiling even further.
That’s what the so-called “outside groups” like the Club for Growth told voters in their ads.
An article in the Indianapolis Star, “Outside money flows in to state’s U.S. Senate race,” informed readers that $4 million was spent by political groups not controlled by the candidates, and that 70 percent backed challenger Mourdock. But Lugar, the powerful incumbent, was still able to raise enough “inside money” to outspend Mourdock by nearly two to one — running nasty attack ads against the challenger.
Without the independent groups and PACs, Lugar’s insider funding and incumbent edge would have been a whopping four to one.
The ability of more voices to speak out helped make the challenger competitive against the incumbent.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Categories
Russell Means
“’Indian policy’ has now been brought down upon the American people, and the American people are the new Indians of the 21st Century.”
Categories
AIM occupation ends
On May 8, 1973, members of the American Indian Movement (AIM) surrendered to federal authorities, ending their 71-day siege of Wounded Knee, site of the infamous massacre of 300 Sioux by the U.S. 7th Cavalry in 1890. Some 200 AIM-led Sioux had seized control of Wounded Knee, and traded gunfire with the federal marshals surrounding the settlement, resulting in two Sioux men being shot to death by federal agents and one federal agent shot and paralyzed. AIM-leader Russell Means began negotiations for the release of the hostages, demanding that the U.S. Senate launch an investigation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Pine Ridge, and all Sioux reservations in South Dakota, and that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hold hearings on the scores of Indian treaties broken by the U.S. government. AIM leaders and their supporters surrendered after White House officials promised to investigate their complaints. Russell Means and Dennis Banks were arrested, but on September 16, 1973, the charges against them were dismissed by a federal judge because of the U.S. government’s unlawful handling of witnesses and evidence.
Categories
Setting the Policy
Vice President Joe Biden got the big headlines over the weekend, with his Meet the Press comments on same-sex marriage. He was quoted everywhere. There was much talk of how this fit (or didn’t fit) with the administration’s official ideology:
I am absolutely comfortable with the fact that men marrying men, women marrying women, and heterosexual men and women marrying one another are entitled to the same exact rights — all the civil rights, all the civil liberties.
But immediately prior to the above, he said this: “I am vice president of the United States of America; the president sets the policy.”
And that’s where I begin to wonder.
It could be he’s only saying that he’s second banana in the administration (if even that high in the banana tree), and that he can’t speak for the top banana.
But too often, these days, when people talk about the president “setting the policy” or “making decisions” (remember George W. Bush’s self-description as “The Decider”?) they seem to suggest something approaching a dictatorship by the president. What the head man says goes.
That’s what Biden’s statement does more than imply.
According to the Constitution, on the other hand, Congress sets policy. Not the president. The legislative power is concentrated in the House and the Senate.
Biden’s kind of loose talk is an artifact of what’s called the “imperial presidency.” Leadership (and followership) of both parties have pushed it. It has a long history.
I don’t know about you, but it gives me a lot more concern than the idea of two dudes marrying.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
“No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.”
Election news from the weekend tells us that Ron Paul won the majority of delegates at Maine’s GOP state convention, with a sizable hunk of Republicans saying, yet again, “no” to Mitt Romney.
In France, Nicolas Sarkozy got ousted, as French voters put in a self-declared socialist for the second time since World War II.
Meanwhile, in beleaguered Greece, elections gave no clear majority to any party.
Since the new French president, François Hollande, has pledged to fight back against German “austerity” measures, and since Greece, too, resists those “bailout” procedures, it looks like the collapse of the European Union may be at hand.
On one level, Greek and French voters seem to prefer to live in that special fantasy land where you can grow government and debt indefinitely and expect good times to roll on forever. On another, they are reacting, at least in part, to the idea that austerity is being pushed by foreigners, that they have been forced not by reality to reform, but by . . . Germans!
Americans wouldn’t be happy about having a policy shoved down their throat by France. Or Germany. Or (more likely) Beijing.
It’s not easy accepting less than one is used to.
Which is why, here in America, neither Obama nor Romney talk seriously about measures to balance the budget. Obama lives in la-la land, and Romney thinks that Rep. Ryan’s plan — which allegedly would balance the budget scores of years from now — is a responsible fix for the irresponsible reality of the day.
Only Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are really taking reality seriously. Perhaps that’s why they are still in the race.
Thus it is, in interesting times.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
Categories
Townhall: Bad to Worst
Variation on a by now well-worn theme: “Bad to Worst” on Townhall.com. Please visit, then come back here to comment, and look for more links:
- “Reading List for the End of an Age” (on what and whom to blame for our continuing financial crisis)
- “Is More Regulation the Answer?” (Common Sense, Steve Chapman, and the eternal question)
- “March to Bankruptcy” (Common Sense … the politics of never-ending bad policy)
- “In Need of Bankruptcy?” (life under “too big to fail”)
- “A Barney Frank Appraisal” (Common Sense … on praising the wrong prophet)
- “Why I Vote, and How” (Common Sense … my personal strategy)
Note: These links are thematically related to this weekend’s Townhall column, not (like usual) source material upon which the column was based. The source material can easily be found by scrolling back through last week’s Common Sense.
Oh, and not covered in the Townhall column was Gary Johnson’s winning the Libertarian Party presidential nomination. Reason? The column was written in advance of Johnson’s Saturday win.
This is stylish, provocative, and … worth thinking about:
There is a reason I usually concentrate my political efforts on initiative measures: by being selective I can avoid making things worse.
Electoral politics, on the other hand, is always fraught with dangers: compromise and betrayal are the norm.
And the voter, when observant, often gets the feeling he’s being “played.” And he (and she) is.
This week I argued that Romney not being elected might be a good thing. I piled on to this notion by supporting Gary Johnson’s Libertarian Party run. Most of my readers who commented disagreed. Vociferously. Their main point? Obama must be stopped.
I note that my readers addressed almost none of the actual reasons I floated for equanimity in the face of a Romney defeat. Instead, they reiterate: Obama must be stopped. I agree, his policies must be stopped; but, in turn, reiterate my point: Romney will do little to reverse course.
Let’s not forget that George W. Bush and the united GOP Congress significantly increased the size and scope of government, and its debt . . . in effect, paving the way for Obama. Too few of us dubbed it “socialism” back then.
Romney seems all too likely to repeat this performance.
We certainly don’t need another president praising free markets and limited government while moving us step-by-step closer to a quasi-socialist serfdom.
I suggest we concentrate on Congress — especially new blood in the old institution — and on Court action, for the most effective resistance to the Democrats’ (and Republicans’) insane lust for spending and debt.
And we need creative initiative action in the states.
By resting hope on a Romney “victory,” I fear conservatives are walking straight into a trap, a familiar trap.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.