All cultures are not equal. Or at least they are not equal in preparing people to be productive in an advanced economy.
Co-authors Amy Wax and Larry Alexander of “Paying the price for breakdown of the country’s bourgeois culture,” The Inquirer (August 9, 2017), an article that caused a huge backlash against Dr. Wax at her institution, the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Immediately following the above-quoted passage, the article continued:
The culture of the Plains Indians was designed for nomadic hunters, but is not suited to a First World, 21st-century environment. Nor are the single-parent, antisocial habits, prevalent among some working-class whites; the anti-“acting white” rap culture of inner-city blacks; the anti-assimilation ideas gaining ground among some Hispanic immigrants. These cultural orientations are not only incompatible with what an advanced free-market economy and a viable democracy require, they are also destructive of a sense of solidarity and reciprocity among Americans. If the bourgeois cultural script — which the upper-middle class still largely observes but now hesitates to preach — cannot be widely reinstated, things are likely to get worse for us all.
Would the re-embrace of bourgeois norms by the ordinary Americans who have abandoned them significantly reduce society’s pathologies? There is every reason to believe so. . . .