Categories
Fifth Amendment rights general freedom international affairs

Brussels Conference Squelched

Paul Jacob on ideological suppression in Europe.

What happened in Brussels?

“In Brussels, in the heart of the European Union, in a western liberal democracy, we’re unable to have a conversation about identity, migration, borders, family, and security without facing attempts to have it shut down,” says Matt Goodwin, a British professor.

The mayor of a Brussels district, Emir Kir, had ordered the shutdown of the National Conservatism Conference in order, he said, to “guarantee public safety.”

But Kir also stated the real reason, that in his neck of the woods “the far right is not welcome.” He apparently disagrees with viewpoints to be elaborated at the conference.

Police took steps to stymie would-​be attendees.

Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orbán said: “The last time they wanted to silence me with the police was when the Communists set them on me in ’88. We didn’t give up then and we will not give up this time either!”

This is a more open targeting of political speech than erasing the “misinformation” of social media posts. Does it signal a new strategy throughout Europe?

Hard to say. The immediate reaction of other European politicians, including many on the left, was dismay and shock that anybody would attempt such a thing. 

“Banning political meetings is unconstitutional. Full stop,” proclaims the Belgian prime minister.

“Extremely disturbing,” says a British spokesman.

Could be sincere; could be a realization that “Uh oh, we’ve gone too far”; could be a mixture of both.

The next question: will it happen again?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder and Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

3 replies on “Brussels Conference Squelched”

Will it happen again? Count on it.
The global ‘elites’ are intent on limiting freedom everywhere and anywhere. As with COVID lockdowns and social media restrictions, ‘safety’ will be their justification. If American parents at schoolboard meetings are considered to be domestic terrorists, then freedom, even in the US, has a very short half-life.

We’ve already seen much this same behavior by officials at state-​run colleges and universities in America. 

So long as these violations are treated as if effected by offices rather than by officers, and as civil offenses rather than as criminal acts, the perpetrators have little incentive not to continue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *