Scott Jennings reports on what he calls “a political earthquake”: both the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association have “gone on the record saying the same thing. There is insufficient evidence to justify ‘gender transition surgeries’ for minors, and these surgeries should generally be deferred to adulthood.”
The ASPS made its statement on February 3, which the New York Times explained was prompted by “a lack of quality research on the long-term outcomes for young people who had undergone surgical interventions like mastectomies and cited ‘emerging evidence of treatment complications and potential harms.’”
The next day, the AMA, the nation’s largest medical organization, spoke up.
When this issue came to the fore a few years ago, the usual response was “this is only happening to a tiny group of young people, if any.” Now, according to TheTimes, a review of “hospital data from 2016 through 2020 identified about 3,600 patients aged 12 to 18 who had received gender-related surgery. The vast majority were mastectomies.”
The Times references a York University social scientist studying “transgender medicine” who attributes the new positions, in part, to “the growing political backlash over gender-affirming care.” Just as Scott Jennings judges these two big turnarounds as huge blows to “the left,” which has supported those surgical practices in the cause of gender-fluidity and ‑identity along with inclusion and whatnot.
By advising against major irreversible interventions into the maturation process of young people, ASPS and the AMA have, at the very least, made a long-overdue advance for Common Sense.
I’m Paul Jacob.
Illustration created with Nano Banana
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts
2 replies on “Medicine Reverses Course”
Midwits try to model their beliefs upon the beliefs of the exceptionally informed and intelligent. Naturally, midwits try to model their beliefs of who is exceptionally informed and intelligent based upon the beliefs of the exceptionally informed and intelligent.
The loop-de-loop in there is the problem. Many children presume their teachers and some of the people on TV to be exceptionally informed and intelligent. As some of these once-respected people behave undeniably like fools, that presumption may be partially abandoned, but most midwits continue to rely on the mutual endorsements of the remainder.
So if the supposèd smart people say that the smart people believe X, then that’s what the midwits believe. Some of them may even be socially promoted to the class of supposèd smart people, thereafter reïnforcing the belief that the smart people believe X.
The proposition that a child of one sex could just know that he or she had a mind better suited to a body altered to be a falsification of the other sex has been an abominable example of a belief that cannot be supported by the application of logic to available evidence, but which caught-on amongst midwits, as they were told that smart people believed this proposition. In their minds, it was part of the Science™.
Doing this to children is nothing short of child abuse, and those doing it should be punished accordingly.