Categories
ideological culture national politics & policies partisanship

Unburdened by the Leftism

Democrats have effectively sidelined the biggest story of this election year — the assassination attempt upon the candidate the party has sought to destroy since 2015 — with a brazen switcheroo-coup from presidential candidate Sleepy Joe to the once-widely disliked Vice President Kamala Harris.

It was all done unceremoniously and undemocratically in a breathtakingly daring backroom duress deal, detailed by Seymour Hersh.

Also itemized last week? The cover-up of Kamala Harris’s record. In “Kamalaflage: Dems race to expunge the evidence of Harris’ leftist history,” Jim Bovard informs New York Post readers about the media’s memory-holing. 

“In 2019, GovTrack labeled Kamala Harris the ‘most liberal’ senator — further to the left than even Bernie Sanders — but this month deleted the webpage that said so,” explains Mr. Bovard.

So, what’s to the left of a “democratic socialist”?

Maybe the Vice President was channeling her father, a Post Keynesian (far, far left if not exactly Marxist) economist, when she pushed the progressives’ beloved “equity” theory of equality, which she explicitly construed as equality of outcomes

If you wonder how far to the left she has gone, consider her work to help BLM-associated rioters. “In 2020, as looters and arsonists ravaged Minneapolis after the killing of George Floyd, then-Sen. Harris urged people to donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund ‘to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota.’” 

Bovard says this appeal “effectively exonerated anyone committing violence or other crimes, portraying them as worthy of speedy release from jail — but the bail fund paid to release rapists and child molesters and future murderers, not just looters.”

Now, fittingly, Harris has chosen Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate, the man who in 2020 “allowed rioters to burn down half of Minneapolis.”

Would a Democratic president want to burn down half of America?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder and Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts

Categories
Today

Purple Heart

On August 7, 1782, George Washington instituted the Badge of Military Merit to honor soldiers wounded in battle, an award later renamed “the Purple Heart.”


Illustration: “Washington Crossing the Delaware,” Emanuel Leutze, 1851, Oil on canvas (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City), depicting an event in 1776, not 1782.

Categories
national politics & policies partisanship

Repeal Obamacare

Oy vey! Given the alternative of Donald Trump on the one hand and — now that Biden has bailed — a bad-as-Biden Biden-substitute on the other, Americans must re-level their look at the lesser of two evils.

It may be difficult to resist hoping that Trump gets elected this November to allow many of the Democrats’ worst initiatives be left to die on a withering vine. (Examples of the worst: Congress-bypassing regulations designed to penalize production of gas-powered cars and outlaw certain freelance or contract work.)

Still, the candidate and his party have many flaws.

We cannot forget that. Indeed, with their abandonment of the tiniest desire to reduce the size of the federal leviathan, remembrance should be easy. 

Shrink government? Radically reduce spending? Reduce debt? No such goal was seriously pursued in the first Trump administration, and no such goal is mentioned in the twenty-point Trump-Republican Party platform.

There’s talk of tax cuts, ending inflation (somehow), diverting spending from Democratic projects. Sure. But the platform insists that Social Security and Medicare programs not be modified in any way. 

In any way!

And about Obamacare — the biggest expansion of the medical state in recent years, which Republicans had once pledged to repeal — the platform is mute.

The 2016 platform said that improving healthcare “must start with repeal of the dishonestly named Affordable Care Act of 2010: Obamacare,” a declaration retained in 2020. Now it’s gone. Republicans seem to have succumbed to the strategy of turning Obamacare into yet another supposedly unassailable, supposedly inextirpable entitlement program.

Unfortunately, you don’t recover or expand liberty by accepting every expansion of serfdom.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder and Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts

Categories
Thought

Branch Cabell

Unreason is at all times one of the happier privileges of patriotism.

Branch Cabell, Ladies and Gentlemen: A Parcel of Reconsiderations (1934), p. 274.
Categories
Today

Jamaican

On August 6, 1962, Jamaica became independent of Great Britain, a little less than two years and three months before Kamala Harris, the most famous Jamaican-American, was born.


In 1991, on this date, Tim Berners-Lee released files describing his idea for the World Wide Web, and put up the first website, running on a NeXT computer at CERN, in France.

Tim Berners-Lee, pioneer of the World Wide Web, c 1990s.
Categories
Today

Flogged, Founded, Fired

On August 5, 1861, the U.S. Army abolished flogging.

The same day 23 years later, Bedloe’s Island in New York Harbor received the foundation stone for the Statue of Liberty (which was featured in the rousing conclusion to Alfred Hitchcock’s wartime picture, Saboteur). The island was renamed Liberty Island, in 1956.

President Ronald Reagan fired 11,359 striking air-traffic controllers (who had ignored his order for them to return to work) on August 5, 1981.

Categories
FYI

The Latest Campaign

Propaganda is a funny business. It is not just rhetoric, the art of persuasive speech and writing. It is a mass media affair attempting to influence mass opinion.

We just witnessed the latest variant from the Democrats and major media (but, as the joke goes, we repeat ourselves). The term the propagandists fixated upon was “weird.”

For a week, we heard it everywhere. “Republicans are weird.” “J. D. Vance’s speech was weird.” “They’re just plain weird.”

But social media being what it is, the mass media campaign to characterize the Democrats’ opponents as “weird” was noticed and instantly mocked in multiple venues.

Conservative podcaster Matt Walsh offered his 1412th episode, “Weird Democrats Think The Nuclear Family Is Weird,” making the most common point: folks who advance the outré in sex and culture have no business calling other people weird. Walsh also focuses in on Senator Manchin’s participation in viral talking point, noting that Machin is calling weird Vance’s discussion of the collapse of the family in America. Manchin’s belittling of this topic as “weird” is not even plausible: of course the topic is worth discussing! “This is what it looks like when a talking point unravels.”

Kat Tenbarge covered this yesterday in “Democrats made ‘weird’ an effective weapon, and then Republicans turned it on LGBTQ people,” which the publisher NBC blurbed “‘Weird’ has quickly become one of the most effective political attacks on the internet.” The reader can judge whether “weird” was indeed, an effective, rather than defective, attack.

The use of “weird” by Democrats appears to have come from a July 23 appearance by Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“We do not like what has happened, when you can’t even go to Thanksgiving dinner with your uncle because you end up in some weird fight that is unnecessary,” Walz, who is in contention to be Harris’ vice presidential pick, said. “Well, it’s true. These guys are just weird.”

The quote was sandwiched in between criticisms of former President Donald Trump and his vice presidential nominee JD Vance, who Walz asserted knows “nothing” about “small-town America.” Walz’s criticism hinged on the right’s focus on culture wars, including its negative characterizations of women without children, its book-banning efforts and sowing division.

The idea that this spread in a normal viral fashion is probably a stretch though. Memos go out. Ideas are pushed and talking heads on TV are given orders. They have been caught many times, and comedian Dave Smith, in his commentary on the “weird” meme, discussed his own experience catching left-liberal Democrat commentators and how the biz word — and why they readily conform to the narrowcast of talking point memos.

To innocents who expect people to speak their own minds, the idea of a mass propaganda campaign may be . . . too weird to accept. “Psychological operations” do not happen. This is just the free flow of ideas!

Well, some ideas just freely flow. But many of the most seemingly viral are indeed coordinated campaigns. And “weird” was (most likely) one.

It probably did not win, though. It was merely the word of the week. Another desperate and mostly ineffective attempt to influence mass opinion.

Or so we can hope.

Categories
Thought

Scott Adams

I don’t think our current system gives us any chance of an election result that the country accepts.

Scott Adams, Real Coffee with Scott Adams, Episode 2555 (August 3, 2024).
Categories
Today

A Prohibition Overturned

On August 4, 2010, in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Judge Vaughn Walker overturned California’s Proposition 8, the ballot initiative prohibiting same-sex marriage that had passed two years earlier by the state’s voters.

Categories
Update

A Duty to Retreat?

According to Minnesota’s Supreme Court, “The duty to retreat when reasonably possible — a judicially created element of self-defense — applies to persons who claim they were acting in self-defense when they committed the felony offense of second-degree assault-fear with a device designed as a weapon and capable of producing death or great bodily harm.”

Though the ruling affects the rights of gun owners (hence the picture, above), the accused person was wielding a machete.

The ruling was decided 4–2, with one justice arguing that this “duty to retreat” is novel and unrealistic. “Until now, the collective wisdom of judges nationwide over hundreds of years has never imposed a duty to retreat before making threats to deter an aggressor,” he wrote.

The ruling, as it stands, provides a precedent for Minnesotan judges, and is not binding outside the state. Nevertheless, it will be awfully tempting for other state courts to mimic. A duty to retreat seems diametrically opposed to “stand your ground” laws and rulings in other states.

Paul Jacob has written about the self-defense issue for years. For example:

The Epoch Times covered this story on Friday.