Watch: We Fight — Why???

Paul focuses on his most controversial commentary of the week, and then the conversation moves back to … Nixon.

Popular Posts (refresh for more)

Smash the Duopoly
When Donald Trump called our country’s electoral process a “rigged …
Sweet Schadenfreude?
Yesterday, jurors convicted former Arkansas State Senator Jon Woods on …
MSNBC Goes Caracas?
Expressing the surprise in some quarters that Venezuelan despot “Maduro …
Daughter Draft
“A man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do.” For years, the …
That Time Paul Harvey Called Me on the Phone
Paul reviews the week’s big stories here on Common Sense …

Thought of the Day

I wish for my own part there were no such thing as Political-Economy. I mean not now the mere name of the study: but I wish there had never been any necessity for directing our attention to the study itself. If men had always been secured in person and property, and left at full liberty to employ both as they saw fit; and had merely been precluded from unjust interference with each other — had the most perfect freedom of intercourse between all mankind been always allowed — had there never been any wars — nor (which in that case would have easily been avoided) any taxation — then, though every exchange that took place would have been one of the phenomena of which Political-Economy takes cognizance, all would have proceeded so smoothly, that probably no attention would ever have been called to the subject. The transactions of society would have been like the play of the lungs, the contractions of the muscles, and the circulation of the blood, in a healthy person; who scarcely knows that these functions exist. But as soon as they are impeded and disordered, our attention is immediately called to them.
Richard Whately, Introductory Lectures on Political Economy (1832), Lecture III.

— Richard Whately

Richard Whately

A First

The Next Population Explosion

Fifty Years After Buckley

Goofy Wig and All

ICE Melt in Minnesota

Not This King?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply