Paul Jacob looks at the reality of modern politics, and what people think of our major institutions. But it could be worse: people could accept that reality as the best possible, as even good itself. Increasingly, this is not the case. Which is the opposite of sad!
If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there’d be a shortage of sand.
On August 28, 1833, the Slavery Abolition Act received Royal Assent, formally abolishing slavery throughout most the British Empire.
What’s worse than the low opinion Americans have for their major institutions? Paul Jacob tells you in this weekend’s episode of This Week in Common Sense:
On August 27, 1991, the European Community recognized the independence of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and Moldova after they had declared their independence from the USSR.
θαρρεῖν, ὦ Θεαίτητε, χρὴ τὸν καὶ σμικρόν τι
δυνάμενον εἰς τὸ πρόσθεν ἀεὶ προϊέναι.
No one should be discouraged, Theaetetus, who can make constant progress, even though it be slow.
Plato, Sophist.
The Department of Homeland Security has caved and is now closing its new Disinformation Governance Board. Critics had been disinformatively saying that the board would probably be used for censorious purposes.
Au contraire, says DHS — even though the board was originally headed by an exponent of countering wrongthink about such matters as the “alleged” Hunter Biden laptop. No. Per DHS, this board really, truly, deep down, supposedly had only benign intentions.
When announcing the shutdown, DHS also announced that it has a bridge to sell you.
(Gotcha! DHS didn’t announce anything about a bridge. That’s just a bit of disinformation that I perpetrated with the help of my woefully abused First Amendment–protected freedom of speech!)
In May, DHS Secretary Mayorkas insisted that the board was no threat to free speech. The point was to address threats “without infringing on free speech.” Rather, the board would be doing things like disputing the strangely persuasive misinformation that the U.S. now has an open southern border.
Even early on, though, the board had been planning to coordinate its anti-disinformative efforts with Big Tech social media firms, which have been censoring on behalf of government. And various government officials will still be working to delegate the nuts and bolts of violating the First Amendment to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, et al. No letup on that front in sight.
DHS may be ending its ill-named board. But beware: its spirit and agenda live on.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
NOTE: This board was previously discussed in these pages on May 2, in “Homeland Censorship Board.”
Illustration assist from DALL-E
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts
Q. What is that fundamental principle?
A. It is justice, which alone comprises all the virtues of society.
Q. Why do you say that justice is the fundamental and almost only virtue of society?
A. Because it alone embraces the practice of all the actions useful to it; and because all the other virtues, under the denominations of charity, humanity, probity, love of one’s country, sincerity, generosity, simplicity of manners, and modesty, are only varied forms and diversified applications of the axiom, “Do not to another what you do not wish to be done to yourself,” which is the definition of justice.
Constantin Francois de Volney, The Law of Nature, Chapter XI: “The Social Virtues; Justice.”
On August 26, 1920, the 19th amendment to United States Constitution took effect, giving women the right to vote in every state of the union.
Prior to the passage of this amendment, 15 states allowed women to vote. Most of them were west of the Mississippi. The territory of Wyoming was the first to extend voting rights to women in 1869.
Yesterday he announced that (quoting The Epoch Times) “his administration will spend hundreds of billions of dollars to pay off $10,000 in federal student loan debt for some borrowers,” with the Education Department giving the specifics: “individuals earning less than $125,000 a year or families earning less than $250,000 will be eligible for up to $10,000 in debt cancellation.” Pell Grant recipients in the same situation will be eligible for relief of up to twice as much.
The politic nature of the move is so obvious that . . . it isn’t getting enough attention from critics.
Most of those alarmed at the move concentrate on the unfairness: rewarding those who have not met their obligations and thereby penalizing those who have. Defenders of student debt relief make the usual arguments about the need to help the under-privileged — by giving them more privilege (if anything’s a privilege it is to be able to take out a loan and then not pay it back).
You may be wondering how a president can authorize spending billions of dollars. Isn’t that Congress’s job? Well, the administration has found a semi-plausible excuse — from Congress: a 2003 higher education law that allows the Education Department to provide relief in response to a national emergency.
And what is the emergency?
Pick one. Inflation, for example.
Which is spurred by overspending.
Which an extra $250 billion will merely increase.
You gotta wonder: isn’t it college graduates who cook up this stuff?
It’s ‘We the People’ who deserve not relief but a full refund.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)
See recent popular posts