It’s a heady time in Nevada. Next year’s election will be the first in which sitting legislators will be ousted under the state’s legislative term limits.
Politicians have begun to think hard about this. Quite a few lower-house reps have set their sights on the state Senate. Well, by “quite a few” I mean “nearly a dozen,” which is how David McGrath Schwartz of the Las Vegas Sun puts it. He also reports that “at least one senator forced out by term limits is seriously considering running for a seat in the Assembly.”
Is this news? Well, it was printed in a newspaper. But it’s hardly earth-shattering.
Yet, in that paper, it was made to seem earth-shattering. Schwartz led with this: “Nevada voters who passed term limits in the 1990s might have imagined it would bring a clean sweep of veteran politicians from office. What they’re likely to get will instead look more like musical chairs.”
Really? Musical chairs?
As analogies for elections in term-limited legislatures go, this falls a bit short. It implies that nearly all legislators will scramble for nearby seats. So far we have less than 13 out of 63.
And it forgets the voters. Who decide. When politicians “hear the music,” the music is played by voters.
Oh, and by the way: Switching chairs — competing for a new position — is one of the reasons for term limits.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
1 reply on “Carson City Cakewalk?”
I think most citizens think of term limits as a means of ending the notions of “carer politician” and “political aristocracy.” It is time for the next step. That is to limit the amount anyone can spend in politics. It is simply too dangerous for a person to wield power for long periods of time.