Categories
election law national politics & policies

Kamala’s Cast on Noncitizens

How did Kamala Harris vote?

The Vice President’s hometown of San Francisco is one of 17 cities that allow noncitizens to vote in local elections. Like 75 percent of those cities (according to verify​.com), the City by the Bay also offers that vote to noncitizens in the country illegally. 

Not included in this list of cities is New York City, as the Big Apple’s measure providing the vote to nearly a million noncitizens is still being battled in court. Or Boston, which only awaits approval by the Massachusetts Legislature. 

Neither are Telluride, Colorado, nor Yellow Springs, Ohio, on the list. Voters in both states, in 2020 and 2022, respectively, passed statewide constitutional amendments to say only U.S. citizens can vote in all state and local elections, canceling those local ordinances. Beginning in 2018, six states have enacted Citizen Only Voting Amendments, and eight more states will vote on them this November. 

Back in 2016, San Franciscans narrowly passed Proposition N giving noncitizen parents and caregivers, legally documented or not, voting rights in school board elections. Harris had been prosecuting attorney in San Fran before becoming California’s attorney general. As AG, Ms. Harris ran for the U.S. Senate and would have gone to vote for herself on Election Day 2016 … and on Prop N. 

Surely, she didn’t forget to vote on the proposition. Right?

So, how did she cast her ballot: in favor of providing noncitizens here illegally the franchise? Or not?

If she ever does a non-​scripted interview, perhaps an enterprising journalist might pop that question. Or perhaps a voter in swing states such as North Carolina and Wisconsin — where Citizen Only Voting Amendments are on the ballot — will ask Vice President Harris. 

Answer, please. 

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob. 


PDF for printing

Illustration created with PicFinder and Firefly

See all recent commentary
(simplified and organized)

See recent popular posts

Categories
Thought

André Gide

It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.

André Gide, Autumn Leaves (Feuillets d’automne, 1941, trans. Jeanine Parisier Plottel).

Categories
Today

Flogged, Founded, Fired

On August 5, 1861, the U.S. Army abolished flogging. 

The same day 23 years later, Bedloe’s Island in New York Harbor received the foundation stone for the Statue of Liberty (which was featured in the rousing conclusion to Alfred Hitchcock’s wartime picture, Saboteur). The island was renamed Liberty Island, in 1956.

President Ronald Reagan fired 11,359 striking air-​traffic controllers (who had ignored his order for them to return to work) on August 5, 1981.

Categories
FYI

The Latest Campaign

Propaganda is a funny business. It is not just rhetoric, the art of persuasive speech and writing. It is a mass media affair attempting to influence mass opinion.

We just witnessed the latest variant from the Democrats and major media (but, as the joke goes, we repeat ourselves). The term the propagandists fixated upon was “weird.”

For a week, we heard it everywhere. “Republicans are weird.” “J. D. Vance’s speech was weird.” “They’re just plain weird.”

But social media being what it is, the mass media campaign to characterize the Democrats’ opponents as “weird” was noticed and instantly mocked in multiple venues.

Conservative podcaster Matt Walsh offered his 1412th episode, “Weird Democrats Think The Nuclear Family Is Weird,” making the most common point: folks who advance the outré in sex and culture have no business calling other people weird. Walsh also focuses in on Senator Manchin’s participation in viral talking point, noting that Machin is calling weird Vance’s discussion of the collapse of the family in America. Manchin’s belittling of this topic as “weird” is not even plausible: of course the topic is worth discussing! “This is what it looks like when a talking point unravels.”

Kat Tenbarge covered this yesterday in “Democrats made ‘weird’ an effective weapon, and then Republicans turned it on LGBTQ people,” which the publisher NBC blurbed “‘Weird’ has quickly become one of the most effective political attacks on the internet.” The reader can judge whether “weird” was indeed, an effective, rather than defective, attack.

The use of “weird” by Democrats appears to have come from a July 23 appearance by Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“We do not like what has happened, when you can’t even go to Thanksgiving dinner with your uncle because you end up in some weird fight that is unnecessary,” Walz, who is in contention to be Harris’ vice presidential pick, said. “Well, it’s true. These guys are just weird.”

The quote was sandwiched in between criticisms of former President Donald Trump and his vice presidential nominee JD Vance, who Walz asserted knows “nothing” about “small-​town America.” Walz’s criticism hinged on the right’s focus on culture wars, including its negative characterizations of women without children, its book-​banning efforts and sowing division.

The idea that this spread in a normal viral fashion is probably a stretch though. Memos go out. Ideas are pushed and talking heads on TV are given orders. They have been caught many times, and comedian Dave Smith, in his commentary on the “weird” meme, discussed his own experience catching left-​liberal Democrat commentators and how the biz word — and why they readily conform to the narrowcast of talking point memos.

To innocents who expect people to speak their own minds, the idea of a mass propaganda campaign may be … too weird to accept. “Psychological operations” do not happen. This is just the free flow of ideas!

Well, some ideas just freely flow. But many of the most seemingly viral are indeed coordinated campaigns. And “weird” was (most likely) one.

It probably did not win, though. It was merely the word of the week. Another desperate and mostly ineffective attempt to influence mass opinion.

Or so we can hope.

Categories
Thought

Scott Adams

I don’t think our current system gives us any chance of an election result that the country accepts.

Scott Adams, Real Coffee with Scott Adams, Episode 2555 (August 3, 2024).
Categories
Today

A Prohibition Overturned

On August 4, 2010, in Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Judge Vaughn Walker overturned California’s Proposition 8, the ballot initiative prohibiting same-​sex marriage that had passed two years earlier by the state’s voters.